Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Sep;12(9):694-703. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1100069.
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical heterogeneity of Parkinson's disease (PD) among a cohort of Chinese patients in early stages. Clinical data on demographics, motor variables, motor phenotypes, disease progression, global cognitive function, depression, apathy, sleep quality, constipation, fatigue, and L-dopa complications were collected from 138 Chinese PD subjects in early stages (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3). The PD subject subtypes were classified using k-means cluster analysis according to the clinical data from five- to three-cluster consecutively. Kappa statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the consistency among different subtype solutions. The cluster analysis indicated four main subtypes: the non-tremor dominant subtype (NTD, n=28, 20.3%), rapid disease progression subtype (RDP, n=7, 5.1%), young-onset subtype (YO, n=50, 36.2%), and tremor dominant subtype (TD, n=53, 38.4%). Overall, 78.3% (108/138) of subjects were always classified between the same three groups (52 always in TD, 7 in RDP, and 49 in NTD), and 98.6% (136/138) between five- and four-cluster solutions. However, subjects classified as NTD in the four-cluster analysis were dispersed into different subtypes in the three-cluster analysis, with low concordance between four- and three-cluster solutions (kappa value=-0.139, P=0.001). This study defines clinical heterogeneity of PD patients in early stages using a data-driven approach. The subtypes generated by the four-cluster solution appear to exhibit ideal internal cohesion and external isolation.
本研究旨在探讨中国早期帕金森病(PD)患者的临床异质性。从 138 名处于早期阶段的中国 PD 患者(Hoehn 和 Yahr 分期 1-3 期)中收集了人口统计学、运动变量、运动表型、疾病进展、整体认知功能、抑郁、淡漠、睡眠质量、便秘、疲劳和左旋多巴并发症的临床数据。使用 k-均值聚类分析根据连续五到三聚类的临床数据对 PD 患者亚型进行分类。使用 Kappa 统计分析评估不同亚型解决方案之间的一致性。聚类分析表明存在四种主要亚型:非震颤主导亚型(NTD,n=28,20.3%)、快速疾病进展亚型(RDP,n=7,5.1%)、早发型亚型(YO,n=50,36.2%)和震颤主导亚型(TD,n=53,38.4%)。总体而言,78.3%(108/138)的患者始终在相同的三组之间进行分类(52 始终为 TD,7 为 RDP,49 为 NTD),98.6%(136/138)在五组和四组解决方案之间。然而,在四组分析中被归类为 NTD 的患者在三组分析中分散到不同的亚型中,四组和三组分析之间的一致性较低(kappa 值=-0.139,P=0.001)。本研究使用数据驱动方法定义了早期 PD 患者的临床异质性。四组解决方案生成的亚型似乎表现出理想的内部凝聚力和外部隔离性。