• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn 2030 motility analyser for routine semen analysis in an infertility clinic.

作者信息

Neuwinger J, Knuth U A, Nieschlag E

机构信息

Max Planck Clinical Research Unit for Reproductive Medicine, Münster, FRG.

出版信息

Int J Androl. 1990 Apr;13(2):100-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1990.tb00967.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2605.1990.tb00967.x
PMID:2188910
Abstract

In routine semen analysis of 242 patients the values of sperm concentration, sperm motility and progressive sperm motility were measured with the Hamilton-Thorn semen analyser (HT) and compared to the data obtained by conventional semen analysis according to the guidelines of the WHO. Overall, the HT gave higher values for sperm concentration (mean difference 21.7 +/- 46.2 x 10(6) ml-1, mean +/- SD). Motility values showed a correlation of 0.67 (slope 0.94, P less than 0.001) but were estimated lower by the HT than by conventional analysis (mean difference 7.3 +/- 21.7%); this was caused by the overestimation of sperm concentration. In the range from 0 to 50% motility the HT yielded lower values and higher values from 50 to 100% motility. Progressive motility values of the HT agreed better with conventional analysis (WHO categories a + b): the mean difference of all values was 0.5 +/- 19.5% (r = 0.74, slope = 1.0). The mean lateral head displacement measured by the HT increased with increasing sperm path velocity, but other significant correlations between sperm movement parameters could not be demonstrated. In many instances round cells and debris could not be distinguished from normal sperm. In conclusion, the HT system cannot replace conventional semen analysis in routine diagnosis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn 2030 motility analyser for routine semen analysis in an infertility clinic.
Int J Androl. 1990 Apr;13(2):100-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1990.tb00967.x.
2
Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn Motility Analyzer for routine semen analysis.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1995 Apr;78(4):182-90.
3
Evaluation of Hamilton-Thorn automated semen analysis system.汉密尔顿-索恩自动精液分析系统评估
Arch Androl. 1992 May-Jun;28(3):213-22. doi: 10.3109/01485019208987700.
4
Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.评估精子运动分析仪系统(SMAS)在评估男性不育症患者精子质量中的应用。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010 Dec;56(6):473-7. doi: 10.3109/19396361003786293. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
5
Assessment of the conventional criteria of semen quality by computer-assisted image analysis: evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyser in the context of a service andrology laboratory.通过计算机辅助图像分析评估精液质量的传统标准:在男科服务实验室环境下对汉密尔顿-桑恩精子活力分析仪的评估
Hum Reprod. 1994 Feb;9(2):310-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138499.
6
Impact of age, clinical conditions, and lifestyle on routine semen parameters and sperm kinematics.年龄、临床状况和生活方式对常规精液参数和精子运动学的影响。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jul 1;110(1):68-75.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.016.
7
Assessment of the Sperm Quality Analyzer.精子质量分析仪的评估
Fertil Steril. 1995 May;63(5):1071-6.
8
A technique for standardization and quality control of subjective sperm motility assessments in semen analysis.精液分析中主观精子活力评估的标准化和质量控制技术。
Fertil Steril. 1997 Jun;67(6):1156-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81455-0.
9
Comparison of semen analysis between the two Hamilton-Thorn semen analysers.两种汉密尔顿-索恩精液分析仪之间的精液分析比较。
Andrologia. 1992 Nov-Dec;24(6):327-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1992.tb02663.x.
10
Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.精子质量分析仪-V(SQA-V)在评估不育男性精子质量方面的实用性。
Arch Androl. 2005 Nov-Dec;51(6):437-42. doi: 10.1080/014850190959081.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of CASA-Mot Analysis of Donkey Sperm: Optimum Frame Rate and Values of Kinematic Variables for Different Counting Chamber and Fields.驴精子CASA-Mot分析的优化:不同计数室和视野下的最佳帧率及运动学变量值
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;10(11):1993. doi: 10.3390/ani10111993.