• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于痴呆症的治疗和护理的理性决策:这是一个自相矛盾的说法吗?

Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: a contradiction in terms?

机构信息

School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.023. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.023
PMID:21889285
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To gain caregivers' insights into the decision-making process in dementia patients with regard to treatment and care.

METHODS

Four focus group interviews (n=29).

RESULTS

The decision-making process consists of three elementary components: (1) identifying an individual's needs; (2) exploring options; and (3) making a choice. The most important phase is the exploration phase as it is crucial for the acceptance of the disease. Furthermore, the decision is experienced more as an emotional choice than a rational one. It is influenced by personal preferences whereas practical aspects do not seem to play a substantial role.

CONCLUSION

Several aspects make decision-making in dementia different from decision-making in the context of other chronic diseases: (1) the difficulty accepting dementia; (2) the progressive nature of dementia; (3) patient's reliance on surrogate decision-making; and (4) strong emotions. Due to these aspects, the decision-making process is very time-consuming, especially the crucial exploration phase.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A more active role is required of both the caregiver and the health care professional especially in the exploration phase, enabling easier acceptance and adjustment to the disease. Acceptance is an important condition for reducing anxiety and resistance to care that may offer significant benefits in the future.

摘要

目的

了解照料者在痴呆症患者的治疗和护理方面的决策过程。

方法

4 次焦点小组访谈(n=29)。

结果

决策过程由三个基本组成部分组成:(1)确定个人需求;(2)探索选择;(3)做出选择。最重要的阶段是探索阶段,因为它对疾病的接受至关重要。此外,决策更多地被体验为一种情感选择,而不是理性选择。它受到个人偏好的影响,而实际方面似乎没有起到重要作用。

结论

与其他慢性疾病背景下的决策相比,痴呆症的决策有几个方面不同:(1)难以接受痴呆症;(2)痴呆症的进展性;(3)患者依赖替代决策;(4)强烈的情绪。由于这些方面,决策过程非常耗时,特别是关键的探索阶段。

实践意义

护理人员和医疗保健专业人员都需要发挥更积极的作用,尤其是在探索阶段,这可以使患者更容易接受和适应疾病。接受是减轻焦虑和对护理的抵制的重要条件,这可能会在未来带来重大收益。

相似文献

1
Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: a contradiction in terms?关于痴呆症的治疗和护理的理性决策:这是一个自相矛盾的说法吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.023. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
2
What perceptions do patients have of decision making (DM)? Toward an integrative patient-centered care model. A qualitative study using focus-group interviews.患者对决策制定(DM)有何看法?迈向以患者为中心的综合护理模式。使用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
3
Preferences for and experiences of family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: patient-caregiver dyads study.患者-照顾者对癌症治疗决策中家庭参与的偏好和体验:患者-照顾者对癌症治疗决策中家庭参与的偏好和体验:患者-照顾者对癌症治疗决策中家庭参与的偏好和体验研究。
Psychooncology. 2013 Nov;22(11):2624-31. doi: 10.1002/pon.3339. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
4
Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.患者参与护理临床决策:护士与患者认知的比较研究
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1498-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01464.x.
5
Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.衡量会诊中的共同决策:OPTION 工具与知情决策工具的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
6
Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.探讨不同教育程度和功能性健康素养群体中患者在医疗决策中的参与情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
7
Quality of decision making is related to decision outcome for patients with cardiac arrhythmia.决策质量与心律失常患者的决策结果有关。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.028. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
8
A thematic analysis of Korean family caregivers' experiences in making the decision to place a family member with dementia in a long-term care facility.对韩国家庭照顾者在决定将患有痴呆症的家庭成员安置在长期护理机构过程中的经历进行的主题分析。
Res Nurs Health. 2004 Oct;27(5):345-56. doi: 10.1002/nur.20031.
9
It's a choice to move forward: women's perceptions about treatment decision making in recurrent ovarian cancer.向前迈进是一种选择:女性对复发性卵巢癌治疗决策的看法。
Psychooncology. 2010 Mar;19(3):318-25. doi: 10.1002/pon.1562.
10
Caregivers' use of spirituality in ethical decision-making.照顾者在道德决策中对灵性的运用。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2005;45(1-2):155-72. doi: 10.1300/J083v45n01_09.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician's perspectives on gene therapy for Alzheimer's disease: A qualitative study.临床医生对阿尔茨海默病基因治疗的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307567. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring the Support and Involvement of Family Caregivers for Reablement Programs: A Qualitative Study.探索家庭照顾者对康复计划的支持与参与:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Oct 11;16:2993-3005. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S424147. eCollection 2023.
3
How do person-centered outcome measures enable shared decision-making for people with dementia and family carers?-A systematic review.
以患者为中心的结果测量如何促进痴呆症患者及其家庭护理人员的共同决策?-一项系统综述。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Jun 6;8(1):e12304. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12304. eCollection 2022.
4
Support needs of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia: a systematic review based on the Noblit and Hare meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies.照顾者在为痴呆症患者做出代理医疗决策时的支持需求:基于 Noblit 和 Hare 元质化综合定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608.
5
Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial.实施针对有记忆主诉的患者及其全科医生的诊断决策辅助工具:一项前后试点试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e049322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322.
6
Practitioner Bias as an Explanation for Low Rates of Palliative Care Among Patients with Advanced Dementia.从业者偏见:晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗率低的一种解释
Health Care Anal. 2022 Mar;30(1):57-72. doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00429-x. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Knowledge Exchanges and Decision-Making Within Hospital Dementia Care Triads: An Ethnographic Study.医院痴呆症护理三角关系中的知识交流与决策制定:一项人种志研究。
Gerontologist. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):954-964. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa216.
8
Transition Experiences of Caregivers of Older Adults With Dementia and Multiple Chronic Conditions: An Interpretive Description Study.患有痴呆症和多种慢性病的老年人照顾者的过渡经历:一项诠释性描述研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jun 18;6:2377960820934290. doi: 10.1177/2377960820934290. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
Perceived added value of a decision support App for formal caregivers in community-based dementia care.社区痴呆症护理中,正式照护者对决策支持应用程序的感知附加价值。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jan;28(1-2):173-181. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14647. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
10
Effectiveness of a Blended Care Self-Management Program for Caregivers of People With Early-Stage Dementia (Partner in Balance): Randomized Controlled Trial.针对早期痴呆症患者照料者的混合式护理自我管理项目(平衡伙伴项目)的有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 13;20(7):e10017. doi: 10.2196/10017.