Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nat Med. 2011 Sep 7;17(9):1060-5. doi: 10.1038/nm.2460.
Alzheimer's disease constitutes a personal and societal tragedy of immense proportions. Since 1960, research in laboratories and clinics worldwide has elucidated many features of this insidious and ultimately fatal syndrome, and this progress has led to initial human trials of potentially disease-modifying agents. However, some of these agents have already failed. Gnawing controversies and important gaps in our knowledge seem to cast additional doubt on the ability of the field to move forward effectively. Here I discuss some of these looming concerns and offer possible explanations for the major trial failures that suggest they are not predictive of the future. Rigorous preclinical validation of mechanism-based therapeutic agents followed by meticulously designed trials that focus on the cardinal cognitive symptoms and their associated biomarkers in the mild or presymptomatic phases of Alzheimer's disease are likely to lead to success, perhaps in the not-too-distant future.
阿尔茨海默病是一场规模巨大的个人和社会悲剧。自 1960 年以来,世界各地的实验室和临床研究已经阐明了这种隐匿且最终致命综合征的许多特征,这一进展促使人们对潜在的可改变疾病进程的药物进行了初步的人体试验。然而,其中一些药物已经失败了。一些挥之不去的争议和我们知识中的重要空白似乎进一步怀疑该领域有效推进的能力。在这里,我将讨论其中一些迫在眉睫的问题,并对主要试验失败提供可能的解释,这些失败表明它们并不能预测未来。对基于机制的治疗药物进行严格的临床前验证,然后精心设计试验,重点关注阿尔茨海默病轻度或无症状阶段的主要认知症状及其相关生物标志物,这可能会导致成功,也许在不久的将来。