• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低手术量中心的腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy at a low-volume center.

作者信息

Santin Brian J, Price Phillip

机构信息

Mount Carmel Health System, Columbus, Ohio 43222, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):41-6. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131138.

DOI:10.4293/108680811X13022985131138
PMID:21902941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3134694/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is associated with a high rate of morbidity, even in specialized centers. Minimally invasive esophageal resection has become increasingly feasible and is gaining popularity in some high-volume institutions. This study assesses the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy performed by a single surgeon at a single low-volume institution over a 20-month period.

METHODS

Over the study period, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. All patients were men with an average age of 70 years (range, 50 to 81).

RESULTS

Two patients required intraoperative conversion to alternative surgical techniques, 1 to an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and 1 to an open transhiatal approach. Average operative time was 198 minutes (range, 147 to 303). Mean hospital stay was 16.7 days (range, 9 to 30). The average number of resected lymph nodes was 11.7, and 2 patients had benign pathology. No deaths occurred in the 30-day postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy is an advanced laparoscopic procedure that can be performed with equivalent morbidity and mortality by a low-volume surgeon in a low-volume center with results comparable to those of high-volume centers. While several authors have demonstrated a correlation between lower mortality rates and high-volume esophagectomy hospitals, our results support surgeon experience as more important than the absolute number of procedures performed each year.

摘要

背景与目的

食管癌的手术治疗即便在专业中心也伴随着较高的发病率。微创食管切除术已变得越来越可行,并且在一些大型机构中越来越受欢迎。本研究评估了一位外科医生在一家低容量机构中在20个月期间进行的腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术的短期结果。

方法

在研究期间,16例患者接受了腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术。所有患者均为男性,平均年龄70岁(范围50至81岁)。

结果

2例患者术中需要转换为其他手术技术,1例转换为艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术,1例转换为开放经裂孔手术。平均手术时间为198分钟(范围147至303分钟)。平均住院时间为16.7天(范围9至30天)。平均切除淋巴结数为11.7个,2例患者病理结果为良性。术后30天内无死亡病例。

结论

腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术是一种先进的腹腔镜手术,低容量中心的低手术量外科医生也能以相当的发病率和死亡率进行该手术,其结果与大型中心相当。虽然有几位作者已经证明较低的死亡率与大型食管切除中心之间存在关联,但我们的结果支持外科医生的经验比每年进行的手术绝对数量更为重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55d/3134694/8da1642e5ea5/jls0011126970001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55d/3134694/8da1642e5ea5/jls0011126970001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55d/3134694/8da1642e5ea5/jls0011126970001.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy at a low-volume center.低手术量中心的腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术
JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):41-6. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131138.
2
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?癌症的微创食管切除术:腹腔镜经裂孔手术还是俯卧位胸腔镜手术继以腹腔镜手术?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9697-7. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
3
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.腹腔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术
Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.12.004.
4
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.微创食管切除术:104例手术的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b72b5.
6
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer.腹腔镜与开放经食管裂孔食管癌切除术治疗远端和交界部癌症。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012 Apr;104(4):197-202. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000400005.
7
Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):188-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9441-3.
8
Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures.胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术治疗良性和恶性疾病:从连续46例手术中吸取的经验教训。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Dec;197(6):902-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.07.005.
9
Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜经裂孔与开放食管切除术治疗T1期食管腺癌的肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):119-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0065-z. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
10
Evidence-based selective application of transhiatal esophagectomy in a high-volume esophageal center.在高容量食管中心,基于证据的选择性应用经食管裂孔食管切除术。
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1307-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.胃食管交界腺癌的微创手术:当前证据与未来展望。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):1675-1690. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675.
2
Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.腹腔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术的术后结果。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):492-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3230-y. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
3
Bariatric surgery in the Caribbean: is it safe in a low-volume, third world setting?

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.开放手术与微创食管胃切除术的对比经验
World J Surg. 2009 Sep;33(9):1868-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0116-1.
2
Fifty-five minimally invasive Esophagectomies: a single centre experience.55例微创食管切除术:单中心经验
Anticancer Res. 2009 Jul;29(7):2719-25.
3
Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons.基于术者手术量的食管癌治疗趋势:618 位食管外科医生的治疗实践。
加勒比地区的减肥手术:在低手术量的第三世界环境中是否安全?
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:427803. doi: 10.1155/2012/427803. Epub 2012 May 8.
Dis Esophagus. 2010 Feb;23(2):136-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00985.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
4
Mortality rate associated with 56 consecutive esophagectomies performed at a "low-volume" hospital: is procedure volume as important as we are trying to make it?一家“低手术量”医院连续进行的56例食管切除术的死亡率:手术量是否真如我们所认为的那般重要?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Aug;12(8):1346-50. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0550-7. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
5
Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer.食管癌微创切除术的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2007 Dec;94(12):1461-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6015.
6
The mid-century revolution in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: part 3.20世纪中叶胸心血管外科的变革:第3部分。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;3(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.icvts.2003.12.003.
7
Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score.食管癌患者的手术死亡率:一种简单风险评分的制定与验证
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 10;24(26):4277-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0658.
8
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: state of the art.微创食管切除术:最新进展
Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00555.x.
9
Minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Jun;85(3):631-47. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.01.003.
10
Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre.食管癌食管胃切除术后吻合口漏:高容量中心预测因素、处理及对长期生存影响的回顾性分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jan;27(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.018.