• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间兼容性效应的相关性:箭头更像位置还是文字?

Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: are arrows more like locations or words?

机构信息

Psychology Department, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA, 90840, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2012 Nov;76(6):777-91. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0378-8. Epub 2011 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-011-0378-8
PMID:21909980
Abstract

Responses are more efficient when their spatial mappings with features of targets are compatible compared to when they are incompatible, even when those features are irrelevant to task performance. Currently, a debate exists as to whether spatial information conveyed by different stimulus modes leads to qualitatively different spatial representations. We investigated the relations between three of the most commonly used spatial stimulus modes-arrows, locations, and location words-using correlations of compatibility effects between each of these modes as well as compatibility effects at different segments of their response time distributions. Our results show that when spatial information is irrelevant to task performance (the Simon task), the compatibility effects elicited by arrows and words are more strongly related with each other than with those of locations. However, when spatial information is task relevant (the stimulus-response compatibility SRC task), the compatibility effects elicited by arrows and locations are more related, and both are less related to the effect elicited by words. We suggest that these changing relations between stimulus modes are strategically determined based on which spatial coding technique for arrows is most advantageous to task performance. Furthermore, the varying relations between these spatial compatibility effects indicate that the compatibility effect with one stimulus mode is not always predictive of the compatibility effect in another mode.

摘要

当刺激的空间映射与目标特征兼容时,反应会更加高效,而当它们不兼容时则会降低效率,即使这些特征与任务表现无关也是如此。目前,人们对于不同刺激模式所传达的空间信息是否会导致截然不同的空间表示存在争议。我们使用这些模式之间的兼容性效应以及它们的反应时分布的不同段之间的兼容性效应的相关性,研究了三种最常用的空间刺激模式(箭头、位置和位置词)之间的关系。我们的结果表明,当空间信息与任务表现无关(Simon 任务)时,箭头和单词引起的兼容性效应彼此之间的相关性比与位置的相关性更强。然而,当空间信息与任务相关(刺激-反应兼容性 SRC 任务)时,箭头和位置引起的兼容性效应更相关,而这两者与单词引起的效应相关性都较低。我们认为,这些刺激模式之间关系的变化是基于哪种箭头的空间编码技术对任务表现最有利而战略性地确定的。此外,这些空间兼容性效应之间的变化关系表明,一种刺激模式的兼容性效应并不总是可以预测另一种模式的兼容性效应。

相似文献

1
Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: are arrows more like locations or words?空间兼容性效应的相关性:箭头更像位置还是文字?
Psychol Res. 2012 Nov;76(6):777-91. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0378-8. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
2
Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.混合位置无关和位置相关试验:刺激模式对空间兼容性效应的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Mar;30(2):281-93. doi: 10.3758/bf03195289.
3
Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.任务定义的关联对于相关维度的选择是模式特定的,但对于位置映射的选择是模式独立的。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Feb;62(2):370-91. doi: 10.1080/17470210801954942. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
4
Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.混合任务和映射下 S-R 兼容性和西蒙效应的分离。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):593-609. doi: 10.1037/a0029923. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
5
How different location modes influence responses in a Simon-like task.不同的定位模式如何影响类西蒙任务中的反应。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1125-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0809-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.视觉刺激模式对习得空间关联转移的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):434-45. doi: 10.1037/a0014529.
7
Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli. An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap.与中央呈现刺激的空间S-R兼容性。维度重叠的事件相关不对称性研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Mar;11(2):214-29. doi: 10.1162/089892999563346.
8
Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.偏差对混合映射环境中视觉空间与言语兼容性效应的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2594-605. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0205-8.
9
Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.混合映射及具有唯一反应的任务的刺激-反应兼容性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):320-40. doi: 10.1080/17470210902925270. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
10
Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?空间刺激-反应相容性中的花朵与蜘蛛:情感效价会影响任务集的选择还是反应的选择?
Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):1003-1017. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1381073. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Sharing an automatic link is crucial in the congruency sequence effect between spatial conflict tasks.共享自动链接在空间冲突任务之间的一致性序列效应中至关重要。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02707-4.
2
Erroneous saccade co-execution during manual action control is independent of oculomotor stimulus-response translation ease.手动动作控制过程中错误的眼球跳动协同发生与眼运动刺激-反应转换的容易程度无关。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2376-2388. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01989-y. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
The Simon Effect Asymmetry for Left- and Right-Dominant Persons.

本文引用的文献

1
An individual differences analysis of memory control.记忆控制的个体差异分析
J Mem Lang. 2006 Jul 1;55(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.006.
2
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.
3
Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: evidence from LRP and N2.Simon 任务中的兼容性-序列效应反映了情节提取,而不是冲突适应:来自 LRP 和 N2 的证据。
左利手和右利手人群的西蒙效应不对称性。
J Cogn. 2023 Mar 3;6(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.265. eCollection 2023.
4
Can We Prepare to Negate? Negation as a Reversal Operator.我们能准备好进行否定吗?作为反转算子的否定
J Cogn. 2020 Sep 30;3(1):32. doi: 10.5334/joc.119.
5
How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation.儿童如何应对冲突?顺序冲突调节的发展研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00766. eCollection 2018.
6
Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow.不同类型的冲突任务对注视和箭头的注意加工产生不同影响。
Iperception. 2018 May 7;9(3):2041669518771713. doi: 10.1177/2041669518771713. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
7
How different direct association routes influence the indirect route in the same Simon-like task.在相同的 Simon 类似任务中,不同的直接关联途径如何影响间接途径。
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1733-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1024-5. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Effects of walking on bilateral differences in spatial attention control: a cross-over design.步行对空间注意力控制双侧差异的影响:一项交叉设计研究。
Arch Physiother. 2015 Oct 23;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s40945-015-0012-y. eCollection 2015.
9
The location-, word-, and arrow-based Simon effects: An ex-Gaussian analysis.基于位置、字词和箭头的西蒙效应:一项高斯分布拟合分析。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Apr;46(3):497-506. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0767-3.
10
Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM).不同类型集合水平一致性下的视动和动视启动:支持观念运动理论以及计划与控制模型(PCM)的证据
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1073-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0885-3. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
Biol Psychol. 2011 Sep;88(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
4
Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects.空间对应效应的反应时分布分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):242-66. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0053-5.
5
Shared spatial representations for physical locations and location words in bilinguals' primary language.双语者第一语言中物理位置和位置词的共享空间表示。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):713-22. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.713.
6
The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part?基于物体的西蒙效应:是抓取可触及部分的抓握功能还是相对位置?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):853-61. doi: 10.1037/a0019328.
7
Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: the case of the numerical distance effect.挑战认知测量的可靠性和有效性:数字距离效应的案例
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
8
The Simon effect with conventional signals: a time-course analysis.传统信号下的西蒙效应:一项时程分析。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):219-27. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.219.
9
Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.视觉刺激模式对习得空间关联转移的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):434-45. doi: 10.1037/a0014529.
10
Reducing and restoring stimulus-response compatibility effects by decreasing the discriminability of location words.通过降低位置词的可辨别性来减少和恢复刺激-反应兼容性效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jan;130(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 28.