• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康教育信息的计算要求:书面糖尿病材料中数值概念的考察。

The numeracy demands of health education information: an examination of numerical concepts in written diabetes materials.

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, and Foundations, University of Northern Iowa, IA, USA.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2012;27(4):344-55. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.586987. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2011.586987
PMID:21916698
Abstract

The comprehension of numerical concepts that appear in written health educational materials is an important aspect of health literacy. Health materials that include many advanced numerical concepts may place high demands on readers, especially those with low health literacy levels. The purpose of this study was to examine and document the types of numerical concepts that appear in passages selected from written diabetes educational materials that varied in their type of content. Readability of the passages was also analyzed. One hundred and fifty passages of 100 words each were selected from 50 diabetes-related educational documents, produced by major health organizations. Passages were coded for type of numerical concept, SMOG Reading Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, and features that elaborated the numerical concepts, such as pictures or explanations. Findings indicate that passages containing general information about diabetes and its prevention contained significantly more advanced numerical concepts, the highest reading grade level, the lowest reading ease scores, and the lowest frequency of elaborative features, relative to many other types of content. Recommendations are made for enhancing the presentation of numerical concepts in written diabetes educational materials.

摘要

对书面健康教育材料中出现的数字概念的理解是健康素养的一个重要方面。包含许多高级数字概念的健康材料可能会对读者提出很高的要求,尤其是那些健康素养水平较低的读者。本研究的目的是检查和记录从不同类型内容的书面糖尿病教育材料中选择的段落中出现的数字概念的类型。还分析了段落的可读性。从主要卫生组织编写的 50 篇糖尿病相关教育文件中,各选取了 100 字的 150 段文字。对段落进行了数字概念类型、SMOG 阅读水平、Flesch 阅读舒适度以及详细阐述数字概念的特征(如图片或解释)的编码。结果表明,与许多其他类型的内容相比,包含有关糖尿病及其预防的一般信息的段落包含了更多的高级数字概念、更高的阅读水平、更低的阅读舒适度得分以及更简洁的阐述特征。针对如何改进书面糖尿病教育材料中数字概念的呈现方式提出了建议。

相似文献

1
The numeracy demands of health education information: an examination of numerical concepts in written diabetes materials.健康教育信息的计算要求:书面糖尿病材料中数值概念的考察。
Health Commun. 2012;27(4):344-55. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.586987. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.基于网络的面部骨折患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1943-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23424. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
An assessment of printed diabetes-prevention materials available to a Northern Plains tribe.评估北方平原部落可获得的印刷版糖尿病预防材料。
J Health Commun. 2011 Apr;16(4):431-47. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546482.
4
Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.基于互联网的消费者健康信息的可读性评估。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1310-5.
5
The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures.美国儿科学会患者教育手册的可读性。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.01.013.
6
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.基于互联网的内镜鼻窦手术相关患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
7
The development and evaluation of written medicines information for type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病书面药物信息的开发与评估
Health Educ Res. 2007 Dec;22(6):918-30. doi: 10.1093/her/cym048. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
8
Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.在线泌尿科患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
9
The impact of medical terminology on readability of patient education materials.医学术语对患者教育材料可读性的影响。
J Community Health Nurs. 2007 Summer;24(2):119-29. doi: 10.1080/07370010701316254.
10
Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册的阅读难度水平
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Dec;74(6):955-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability and beyond - Health literacy and numeracy and COVID-19 communications in early childhood education: Are we communicating effectively?可读性及其他——幼儿期健康素养和算数能力与 COVID-19 传播:我们的沟通是否有效?
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107823. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107823. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Alignment of Patient Health Numeracy with Asthma Care Instructions in the Patient Portal.患者健康数字素养与患者门户网站中哮喘护理说明的一致性。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Mar 23;1(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170307-01. eCollection 2017 Jan.
3
Effects of Diabetes Numeracy on Glycemic Control and Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors in Patients on Insulin Pump Therapy.
糖尿病数字能力对胰岛素泵治疗患者血糖控制及糖尿病自我管理行为的影响。
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1337-1346. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0634-2. Epub 2019 May 30.
4
Development and validation of the numeracy understanding in Medicine Instrument short form.医学数字理解量表简表的编制与验证
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2(0 2):240-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.933916.
5
The effectiveness of a community health program in improving diabetes knowledge in the Hispanic population: Salud y Bienestar (Health and Wellness).社区健康计划在提高西班牙裔人群糖尿病知识方面的效果:Salud y Bienestar(健康与幸福)。
J Community Health. 2013 Dec;38(6):1124-31. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9722-9.