• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学数字理解量表简表的编制与验证

Development and validation of the numeracy understanding in Medicine Instrument short form.

作者信息

Schapira Marilyn M, Walker Cindy M, Miller Tamara, Fletcher Kathlyn E, Ganschow Pamela S, Jacobs Elizabeth A, Imbert Diana, O'Connell Maria, Neuner Joan M

机构信息

a Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2(0 2):240-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.933916.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2014.933916
PMID:25315596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4201377/
Abstract

Health numeracy can be defined as the ability to understand and use numeric information and quantitative concepts in the context of health. The authors previously reported the development of the Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument (NUMi), a 20-item test developed using item response theory. The authors now report the development and validation of a short form of the NUMi. Item statistics were used to identify a subset of 8 items representing a range of difficulty and content areas. Internal reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha. Divergent and convergent validity was assessed by comparing scores of the S-NUMI with existing measures of education, print and numeric health literacy, mathematic achievement, cognitive reasoning, and the original NUMi. The 8-item scale had adequate reliability (α=.72) and was strongly correlated to the 20-item NUMi (α=.92). S-NUMi scores were strongly correlated with the Lipkus Expanded Health Numeracy Scale (α=.62), the Wide Range of Achievement Test-Mathematics (α=.72), and the Wonderlic Cognitive Ability Test (α=.76). Moderate correlation was found with education level (α=.58) and print literacy as measured by the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (α=.49). Results show that the short form of the NUMi is a reliable and valid measure of health numeracy feasible for use in clinical and research settings.

摘要

健康数字素养可定义为在健康背景下理解和运用数字信息及定量概念的能力。作者之前报告了医学数字素养理解工具(NUMi)的开发情况,这是一项采用项目反应理论开发的包含20个条目的测试。作者现在报告NUMi简版的开发与验证情况。利用项目统计数据来确定一个由8个条目组成的子集,这些条目代表了一系列难度和内容领域。使用克朗巴哈系数评估内部信度。通过比较简版NUMi(S-NUMI)与教育、印刷和数字健康素养、数学成绩、认知推理以及原始NUMi的现有测量指标的得分,来评估区分效度和聚合效度。这个8条目量表具有足够的信度(α = 0.72),并且与20条目NUMi(α = 0.92)高度相关。S-NUMi得分与利普库斯扩展健康数字素养量表(α = 0.62)、广泛成就测试 - 数学(α = 0.72)以及旺德利克认知能力测试(α = 0.76)高度相关。发现与教育水平(α = 0.58)以及由成人功能性健康素养测试所测量的印刷素养(α = 0.49)存在中度相关性。结果表明,NUMi简版是一种可靠且有效的健康数字素养测量工具,适用于临床和研究环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/4201377/d928b2ac9f41/nihms622972f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/4201377/d928b2ac9f41/nihms622972f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fb/4201377/d928b2ac9f41/nihms622972f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the numeracy understanding in Medicine Instrument short form.医学数字理解量表简表的编制与验证
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2(0 2):240-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.933916.
2
The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: a measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory.医学算数理解量表:一种使用项目反应理论开发的健康算数测量工具。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):851-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12447239. Epub 2012 May 25.
3
Development and Validation of the Spanish Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument.西班牙医学数字理解工具的开发与验证
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1345-1352. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3759-2. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.主观数字能力量表简短三项版的验证
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):932-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15581800. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
5
The Health Literacy Skills Instrument: a 10-item short form.健康素养技能量表:一个 10 项的简短形式。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:191-202. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.718042.
6
Health numeracy in Japan: measures of basic numeracy account for framing bias in a highly numerate population.日本的健康算数能力:基本算数能力的衡量标准在一个高度算数的人群中存在框架偏见。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 11;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-104.
7
Short, subjective measures of numeracy and general health literacy in an adult emergency department.成人急诊室中简短的主观算术和一般健康素养测量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1148-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01210.x.
8
Development and evaluation of the Korean Health Literacy Instrument.韩国健康素养量表的开发与评估。
J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2:254-66. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.946113.
9
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
10
A New Objective Health Numeracy Test for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.一种用于 2 型糖尿病患者的新型客观健康算数测试:心理测量学特性的开发和评估。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 May;14(2):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving lung cancer decision-making using a conversation tool (iDECIDE): a stepped wedge pragmatic clinical trial.使用对话工具(iDECIDE)改善肺癌决策:一项阶梯楔形实用临床试验。
Future Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(9):1045-1056. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Stated-Preference Survey Design and Testing in Health Applications.健康应用中的陈述偏好调查设计与测试
Patient. 2025 May;18(3):187-197. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00671-6. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
3
Defining and identifying laboratory literacy as a component of health literacy: An assessment of existing health literacy tools.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute stress differentially affects spatial configuration learning in high and low cortisol-responding healthy adults.急性应激在高和低皮质醇反应健康成年人中对空间构型学习有不同的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 May 2;4. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.19854. Print 2013.
2
Acute pre-learning stress and declarative memory: impact of sex, cortisol response and menstrual cycle phase.急性预学习应激与陈述性记忆:性别、皮质醇反应和月经周期阶段的影响。
Horm Behav. 2013 May;63(5):759-65. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
3
Doctor talk: physicians' use of clear verbal communication.
将实验室素养定义并确定为健康素养的一个组成部分:对现有健康素养工具的评估。
Acad Pathol. 2023 Nov 2;10(4):100096. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100096. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
4
Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于初级保健环境的肺癌筛查决策辅助工具:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30452.
5
Show me the roads and give me a road map: Development of a patient conversation tool to improve lung cancer treatment decision-making.向我展示道路并给我一张路线图:开发一种患者沟通工具以改善肺癌治疗决策。
PEC Innov. 2022 Oct 21;1:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100094. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Lower objectively and subjectively assessed numeracy are both associated with poorer self-rated health.客观评估和主观评估的计算能力较低均与自我评估健康状况较差有关。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Aug 21;14(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05737-y.
7
Preferences for Predictive Model Characteristics among People Living with Chronic Lung Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.慢性肺部疾病患者对预测模型特征的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jul;40(5):633-643. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20932152. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Improving Communication in Breast Cancer Treatment Consultation: Use of a Computer Test of Health Numeracy.提高乳腺癌治疗咨询中的沟通:使用健康算数计算机测试。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Oct;28(10):1407-1417. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7347. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
9
Development of a Sesotho health literacy test in a South African context.在南非背景下开发索托语健康素养测试。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 Apr 24;11(1):e1-e13. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1853.
10
Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.预测模型定量方面的数字能力与理解:一项试点研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):683-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669457. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
医生谈:医生使用清晰的口头沟通。
J Health Commun. 2013 Aug;18(8):991-1001. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757398. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
4
Development and validation of the General Health Numeracy Test (GHNT).一般健康算数测试(GHNT)的编制与验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
5
The development and validation of the hypertension evaluation of lifestyle and management knowledge scale.生活方式和管理知识评估高血压量表的编制与验证。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Jul;14(7):461-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00619.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
6
The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: a measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory.医学算数理解量表:一种使用项目反应理论开发的健康算数测量工具。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):851-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12447239. Epub 2012 May 25.
7
The numeracy demands of health education information: an examination of numerical concepts in written diabetes materials.健康教育信息的计算要求:书面糖尿病材料中数值概念的考察。
Health Commun. 2012;27(4):344-55. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.586987. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
Designing interventions to overcome poor numeracy and improve medication adherence in chronic illness, including HIV/AIDS.设计干预措施以克服慢性疾病(包括 HIV/AIDS)中的低算术能力和改善药物依从性。
J Med Toxicol. 2011 Jun;7(2):133-8. doi: 10.1007/s13181-011-0149-3.
9
Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit.开发和测试健康素养通用预防工具包。
Nurs Outlook. 2011 Mar-Apr;59(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.002.
10
The meaning of numbers in health: exploring health numeracy in a Mexican-American population.健康数字的意义:在墨西哥裔美国人中探索健康算数能力。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):705-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1645-5. Epub 2011 Feb 19.