• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经耻骨后膀胱颈再吻合术治疗高复发和复杂的膀胱颈狭窄

Open retropubic reanastomosis for highly recurrent and complex bladder neck stenosis.

机构信息

Departments of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf and Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Harburg, WHMM, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1944-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.040. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.040
PMID:21944115
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the success rate of open reanastomosis for highly recurrent bladder neck stenosis resistant to transurethral treatment. Due to the paucity of available data the success rate of this procedure is not well defined, although it can be a last treatment option before urinary diversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 158 patients were treated for bladder neck stenosis in 1998 to 2007, of whom 20 underwent open reanastomosis for highly recurrent or complex bladder neck stenosis after radical prostatectomy and were seen for followup 3 months postoperatively. They received a standardized questionnaire at the time of data acquisition in this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

The 20 patients underwent a mean of 3.7 previous surgeries. Median followup was 59.2 months. Stenosis recurred after reanastomosis in 8 patients (40%) while the remaining 60% were recurrence free. Seven recurrences were successfully treated endoscopically, resulting in an overall combined 95% success rate. Urinary diversion was performed in 1 patient with another recurrence after reanastomosis and transurethral resection. Four patients (31%) had new onset incontinence and 13 were completely incontinent, of whom 9 were successfully treated with artificial urinary sphincter implantation. In another patient artificial urinary sphincter implantation is scheduled and 3 elected no further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Open reanastomosis for recurrent bladder neck stenosis is a good therapeutic option in cases of endoscopic treatment failure. The initial success rate after reanastomosis was 60%, which increased to 95% after secondary treatment. There was a relatively high risk of new onset incontinence after reconstructive surgery but this was successfully treated with artificial urinary sphincter implantation in most patients.

摘要

目的

我们评估了经尿道治疗抵抗的高度复发性膀胱颈狭窄的开放再吻合术的成功率。由于可用数据的缺乏,该手术的成功率尚未明确,尽管它可能是尿流改道前的最后一种治疗选择。

材料与方法

1998 年至 2007 年,共有 158 例患者接受了膀胱颈狭窄治疗,其中 20 例接受了根治性前列腺切除术后高度复发性或复杂膀胱颈狭窄的开放再吻合术,并在术后 3 个月进行了随访。在这项回顾性分析中,他们在数据采集时接受了标准化问卷。

结果

20 例患者平均接受了 3.7 次先前的手术。中位随访时间为 59.2 个月。再吻合术后 8 例(40%)出现狭窄复发,而其余 60%的患者无复发。7 例复发患者经内镜治疗成功,总成功率为 95%。1 例患者因再吻合术后和经尿道切除术后再次复发而进行了尿流改道。4 例(31%)患者新发尿失禁,13 例完全失禁,其中 9 例通过人工尿道括约肌植入术成功治疗。另有 1 例患者计划进行人工尿道括约肌植入术,3 例患者选择不再进一步治疗。

结论

对于内镜治疗失败的复发性膀胱颈狭窄,开放再吻合术是一种良好的治疗选择。再吻合术后的初始成功率为 60%,经二次治疗后增加至 95%。重建手术后新发尿失禁的风险相对较高,但大多数患者通过人工尿道括约肌植入术成功治疗。

相似文献

1
Open retropubic reanastomosis for highly recurrent and complex bladder neck stenosis.经耻骨后膀胱颈再吻合术治疗高复发和复杂的膀胱颈狭窄
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1944-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.040. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
2
Use of Solovov-Badenoch principle in treating severe and recurrent vesico-urethral anastomosis stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy: technique and long-term results.采用 Solovov-Badenoch 原则治疗根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后严重且复发性的膀胱-尿道吻合口狭窄:技术与长期疗效。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E456-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11132.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
3
Outcome analysis of urethral wall stent insertion with artificial urinary sphincter placement for severe recurrent bladder neck contracture following radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后严重复发性膀胱颈挛缩患者行尿道壁支架置入联合人工尿道括约肌植入的疗效分析
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
4
Patency and Incontinence Rates After Robotic Bladder Neck Reconstruction for Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis and Recalcitrant Bladder Neck Contractures: The Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons Experience.机器人辅助膀胱颈重建治疗膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄和顽固性膀胱颈挛缩后的通畅率和尿失禁发生率:创伤与泌尿外科重建外科医生网络的经验
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 16.
5
Management of recurrent anastomotic stenosis following radical prostatectomy using holmium laser and steroid injection.钬激光联合类固醇注射治疗前列腺癌根治术后复发性吻合口狭窄
BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(7):796-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07919.x. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
6
Two-stage transperineal management of posterior urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures associated with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery and endoscopic treatment failures.前列腺手术后与尿失禁相关的后尿道狭窄或膀胱颈挛缩的两阶段经会阴处理及内镜治疗失败后的处理
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.053. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
7
Bladder neck incision for female bladder neck obstruction: long-term outcomes.女性膀胱颈梗阻行膀胱颈切开术:长期疗效。
Urology. 2014 Apr;83(4):762-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.084.
8
Total bladder and posterior urethral reconstruction: salvage technique for defunctionalized bladder with recalcitrant posterior urethral stenosis.全膀胱及后尿道重建:用于功能丧失且伴有顽固性后尿道狭窄膀胱的挽救技术
J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1649-54. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.102. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
9
Safety and effectiveness evaluation of open reanastomosis for obliterative or recalcitrant anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄的开放性再吻合术的安全性和有效性评估。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):253-261. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0681.
10
Treatment of recurrent vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy using plasma-button vaporization.经尿道等离子纽扣状汽化术治疗前列腺癌根治术后复发性膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄
Scand J Urol. 2015;49(5):371-6. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1012115. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of open perineal and robot-assisted reconstruction in vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis.开放性会阴重建术与机器人辅助重建术治疗膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的比较
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 7;43(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05808-w.
2
Summarizing the evidence for robotic-assisted bladder neck reconstruction: Systematic review of patency and incontinence outcomes.总结机器人辅助膀胱颈重建的证据:通畅性和尿失禁结局的系统评价。
Asian J Urol. 2024 Jul;11(3):341-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
Management of the Devastated Bladder Outlet after Prostate CANCER Treatment.
前列腺癌治疗后膀胱出口损毁的处理。
Curr Urol Rep. 2024 Jul;25(7):149-162. doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01206-8. Epub 2024 May 16.
4
Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology.机器人辅助手术在功能重建和神经泌尿学中应用的当前证据。
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Dec 1;15:17562872231213727. doi: 10.1177/17562872231213727. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Refractory Bladder Neck Contracture (BNC) After Radical Prostatectomy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenges.根治性前列腺切除术后难治性膀胱颈挛缩(BNC):患病率、影响及管理挑战
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Nov 7;15:495-507. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S350777. eCollection 2023.
6
Devastated Bladder Outlet in Pelvic Cancer Survivors: Issues on Surgical Reconstruction and Quality of Life.盆腔癌幸存者的膀胱出口严重受损:手术重建及生活质量问题
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 24;10(21):4920. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214920.
7
Contemporary Management of Vesico-Urethral Anastomotic Stenosis After Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的当代管理
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 26;7:587271. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.587271. eCollection 2020.
8
Perineoscopic vesicourethral reconstruction: A novel surgical technique for anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy.经会阴膀胱尿道重建术:一种根治性前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄的新型手术技术。
Turk J Urol. 2021 Jan;47(1):51-57. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20372. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
9
[Anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy and bladder neck stenosis after benign prostate hyperplasia treatment: reconstructive options].[根治性前列腺切除术后吻合口狭窄及良性前列腺增生治疗后膀胱颈狭窄:重建选择]
Urologe A. 2020 Apr;59(4):398-407. doi: 10.1007/s00120-020-01143-7.
10
Robotic urethral reconstruction: redefining the paradigm of posterior urethroplasty.机器人辅助尿道重建:重新定义后尿道成形术的范式
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Feb;9(1):121-131. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.22.