School of Nursing & Midwifery, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston 3199, Australia.
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):e705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
in 2009 the Australian government announced a programme of reform that will change the way maternity services have traditionally been delivered. A shift to a primary maternity care model has occurred despite strong challenges from medicine and a general public that has embraced high technology in all aspects of life including childbirth.
a critical analysis was undertaken for the purpose of identifying discourses that have influenced the direction of the Australian maternity care reform agenda.
within a critical discourse analysis framework data were collected from state, territory and commonwealth government policy documents, and selected written submissions from national key stakeholder organisations to the National Review of Maternity Services 2008.
three discourses influencing the direction of the reform are described, these include the following: 'Australia is one of the safest place to give birth or to be born, but not for everyone'; 'maternity care is primarily about mothers and babies, not about the service or the health professionals' and 'government must ensure provision of safe and sustainable maternity services'.
the Australian government has strong support for the primary maternity care reform backed by a strong key stakeholder alliance involving consumers, midwives and rural doctors. On the contrary to the position of the key stakeholder alliance, the obstetric position has been unable to provide government with solutions to escalating costs and workforce deficits in the delivery of safe and sustainable maternity services. Consumers, rural doctors, midwives and government all agree on the need to safeguard excellent safety and quality standards whilst at the same time reducing high levels of medical intervention and providing options for care in a reformed maternity service designed to meet the needs of all Australian women.
2009 年,澳大利亚政府宣布了一项改革计划,该计划将改变传统上提供产妇服务的方式。尽管医学和公众在生活的各个方面都接受了包括分娩在内的高科技,但仍转向了主要的产妇护理模式。
进行了批判性分析,目的是确定影响澳大利亚产妇保健改革议程方向的话语。
在批判性话语分析框架内,从州、地区和联邦政府的政策文件中收集数据,并从全国关键利益相关者组织向 2008 年国家产妇保健审查提交的选定书面意见中收集数据。
描述了影响改革方向的三个话语,包括以下内容:“澳大利亚是生孩子或出生最安全的地方之一,但不是对每个人而言”;“产妇保健主要是关于母亲和婴儿,而不是服务或卫生专业人员”和“政府必须确保提供安全和可持续的产妇保健服务”。
澳大利亚政府强烈支持主要的产妇保健改革,得到了包括消费者、助产士和农村医生在内的强大的关键利益相关者联盟的支持。与关键利益相关者联盟的立场相反,产科立场无法为政府提供解决不断上升的成本和劳动力短缺问题的方案,以提供安全和可持续的产妇保健服务。消费者、农村医生、助产士和政府都同意需要维护卓越的安全和质量标准,同时减少高水平的医疗干预,并为在改革后的产妇服务中提供护理选择,以满足所有澳大利亚妇女的需求。