国际疾病分类第十版（ICD - 10）与国际疾病分类第九版（ICD - 9）及精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版（DSM - III）对精神障碍分类的比较。
Comparison of the ICD-10-classification with the ICD-9- and the DSM-III-classification of mental disorders.
作者信息
Maier W, Philipp M, Zaudig M
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, FRG.
出版信息
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990 Jun;23 Suppl 4:183-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014562.
The diagnostic concepts in ICD-10 show better congruence with those in DSM-III than with those in ICD-9. The diagnostic definitions used by ICD-10 and DSM-III for the majority of diagnoses turn out to be similar; the definitions of anxiety disorders and schizoaffective disorders are, however, still at variance. Consequently, the empirical results from the WHO field trial in German-speaking countries reveal a high degree of overlap between the two systems; the degree of overlap between ICD-9 and ICD-10 was lower, but still surprisingly high overall. These empirical results support the validity of ICD-10.
《国际疾病分类第10版》（ICD - 10）中的诊断概念与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第3版》（DSM - III）中的诊断概念的一致性，比与《国际疾病分类第9版》（ICD - 9）中的诊断概念的一致性更好。ICD - 10和DSM - III对大多数诊断所使用的诊断定义结果是相似的；然而，焦虑症和分裂情感性障碍的定义仍然存在差异。因此，世界卫生组织在德语国家进行的现场试验的实证结果显示，这两个系统之间存在高度重叠；ICD - 9和ICD - 10之间的重叠程度较低，但总体上仍然高得出奇。这些实证结果支持了ICD - 10的有效性。
Zotero 插件