Suppr超能文献

国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)与国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)及精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版(DSM - III)对精神障碍分类的比较。

Comparison of the ICD-10-classification with the ICD-9- and the DSM-III-classification of mental disorders.

作者信息

Maier W, Philipp M, Zaudig M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, FRG.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990 Jun;23 Suppl 4:183-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014562.

Abstract

The diagnostic concepts in ICD-10 show better congruence with those in DSM-III than with those in ICD-9. The diagnostic definitions used by ICD-10 and DSM-III for the majority of diagnoses turn out to be similar; the definitions of anxiety disorders and schizoaffective disorders are, however, still at variance. Consequently, the empirical results from the WHO field trial in German-speaking countries reveal a high degree of overlap between the two systems; the degree of overlap between ICD-9 and ICD-10 was lower, but still surprisingly high overall. These empirical results support the validity of ICD-10.

摘要

《国际疾病分类第10版》(ICD - 10)中的诊断概念与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第3版》(DSM - III)中的诊断概念的一致性,比与《国际疾病分类第9版》(ICD - 9)中的诊断概念的一致性更好。ICD - 10和DSM - III对大多数诊断所使用的诊断定义结果是相似的;然而,焦虑症和分裂情感性障碍的定义仍然存在差异。因此,世界卫生组织在德语国家进行的现场试验的实证结果显示,这两个系统之间存在高度重叠;ICD - 9和ICD - 10之间的重叠程度较低,但总体上仍然高得出奇。这些实证结果支持了ICD - 10的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验