National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Nov;8(11):625-35. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.616161.
Effective decontamination of chemical protective clothing (CPC) is essential for reducing occupational skin diseases and disorders during a reuse scenario. To protect the workforce, the efficacy of decontamination methods and the reusability of CPC need to be evaluated. In this study, performance of 14 CPC materials against 12 liquid chemicals was evaluated based on standardized breakthrough time (BT) and steady-state permeation rate (SSPR). Thermal and water-detergent decontamination methods were used. Exposure/decontamination was repeated up to 11 cycles, or until the material failed, so that further testing became impossible. Changes in BT and SSPRs were determined for each material and chemical combination. There were 20 and 13 combinations that were able to complete 11 cycles with thermal and detergent methods, respectively. By comparing the beginning and ending cycles, mean BT increased 9% with the thermal method but slightly decreased (3.3%) with the detergent method, while mean SSPR decreased 2% with the thermal method, but slightly increased (1.4%) with the detergent method. Less than half of the changes were found statistically different (p < 0.05). Generally, the thermal method had higher decontamination efficacy than the detergent method.
有效清洗化学防护服(CPC)对于减少重复使用场景中的职业性皮肤病和疾病至关重要。为了保护工作人员,需要评估去污方法的效果和 CPC 的可重复使用性。在这项研究中,根据标准化突破时间(BT)和稳态渗透速率(SSPR),评估了 14 种 CPC 材料对 12 种液体化学品的性能。使用了热和水洗涤剂去污方法。暴露/去污过程重复进行了 11 个周期,或者直到材料失效,以至于无法进一步测试。确定了每种材料和化学品组合的 BT 和 SSPR 的变化。分别有 20 和 13 种组合能够通过热和洗涤剂方法完成 11 个周期。通过比较开始和结束周期,发现热法的平均 BT 增加了 9%,但洗涤剂法略有下降(3.3%),而热法的平均 SSPR 下降了 2%,但洗涤剂法略有增加(1.4%)。不到一半的变化在统计学上有显著差异(p < 0.05)。一般来说,热法的去污效果比洗涤剂法好。