Suppr超能文献

归一化差异植被指数作为衡量社区绿化程度的指标的验证。

Validation of the normalized difference vegetation index as a measure of neighborhood greenness.

机构信息

Social Development Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):946-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the validity of a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) measure, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), as a measure of neighborhood greenness for epidemiologic research.

METHODS

Using remote-sensing spectral data, NDVI was calculated for a 100-m radial distance around 124 residences in greater Seattle. The criterion standard was rating of greenness for corresponding residential areas by 3 environmental psychologists. Pearson correlations and regression models were used to assess the association between the psychologists' ratings of greenness and NDVI. Analyses were also stratified by residential density to assess whether the correlations differed between low and high density.

RESULTS

The mean NDVI among this sample of residences was 0.27 (standard deviation [SD], 0.11; range, -0.04 to 0.54), and the mean psychologist rating of greenness was 2.84 (SD, 0.98; range, 1-5). The correlation between NDVI and expert ratings of greenness was high (r = 0.69). The correlation was equivalently strong within each strata of residential density.

CONCLUSIONS

NDVI is a useful measure of neighborhood greenness. In addition to showing a strong correlation with expert ratings, this measure has practical advantages, including availability of data and ease of application to various boundaries, which would aid in replication and comparability across studies.

摘要

目的

评估地理信息系统(GIS)指标归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)作为生态研究中衡量邻里绿化程度的有效性。

方法

利用遥感光谱数据,计算了大西雅图地区 124 处住宅周围 100 米半径内的 NDVI。标准是由 3 位环境心理学家对相应居住区域的绿化程度进行评分。采用 Pearson 相关系数和回归模型来评估心理学家对绿化程度的评分与 NDVI 之间的关联。还按居住密度进行分层分析,以评估低和高密度之间的相关性是否存在差异。

结果

该住宅样本的平均 NDVI 为 0.27(标准差[SD]为 0.11;范围为-0.04 至 0.54),环境心理学家对绿化程度的平均评分是 2.84(SD 为 0.98;范围为 1-5)。NDVI 与专家对绿化程度的评分之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.69)。在每个居住密度分层中,相关性同样很强。

结论

NDVI 是衡量邻里绿化程度的有效指标。除了与专家评分具有很强的相关性外,该指标还具有实际优势,包括数据可用性和易于应用于各种边界,这将有助于研究之间的复制和可比性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes.邻里建成环境与收入:审视多种健康结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Apr;68(7):1285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
7
Are neighbourhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A review of evidence.邻里特征与抑郁症状有关联吗?证据综述。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Nov;62(11):940-6, 8 p following 946. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.066605. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
10
The built environment and collective efficacy.建筑环境与集体效能。
Health Place. 2008 Jun;14(2):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验