Social Development Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):946-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
To assess the validity of a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) measure, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), as a measure of neighborhood greenness for epidemiologic research.
Using remote-sensing spectral data, NDVI was calculated for a 100-m radial distance around 124 residences in greater Seattle. The criterion standard was rating of greenness for corresponding residential areas by 3 environmental psychologists. Pearson correlations and regression models were used to assess the association between the psychologists' ratings of greenness and NDVI. Analyses were also stratified by residential density to assess whether the correlations differed between low and high density.
The mean NDVI among this sample of residences was 0.27 (standard deviation [SD], 0.11; range, -0.04 to 0.54), and the mean psychologist rating of greenness was 2.84 (SD, 0.98; range, 1-5). The correlation between NDVI and expert ratings of greenness was high (r = 0.69). The correlation was equivalently strong within each strata of residential density.
NDVI is a useful measure of neighborhood greenness. In addition to showing a strong correlation with expert ratings, this measure has practical advantages, including availability of data and ease of application to various boundaries, which would aid in replication and comparability across studies.
评估地理信息系统(GIS)指标归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)作为生态研究中衡量邻里绿化程度的有效性。
利用遥感光谱数据,计算了大西雅图地区 124 处住宅周围 100 米半径内的 NDVI。标准是由 3 位环境心理学家对相应居住区域的绿化程度进行评分。采用 Pearson 相关系数和回归模型来评估心理学家对绿化程度的评分与 NDVI 之间的关联。还按居住密度进行分层分析,以评估低和高密度之间的相关性是否存在差异。
该住宅样本的平均 NDVI 为 0.27(标准差[SD]为 0.11;范围为-0.04 至 0.54),环境心理学家对绿化程度的平均评分是 2.84(SD 为 0.98;范围为 1-5)。NDVI 与专家对绿化程度的评分之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.69)。在每个居住密度分层中,相关性同样很强。
NDVI 是衡量邻里绿化程度的有效指标。除了与专家评分具有很强的相关性外,该指标还具有实际优势,包括数据可用性和易于应用于各种边界,这将有助于研究之间的复制和可比性。