Suppr超能文献

痴呆症“知识”结局测量指标的系统评价。

A systematic review of 'knowledge of dementia' outcome measures.

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.

出版信息

Ageing Res Rev. 2012 Jan;11(1):67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Abstract

Knowledge of dementia measures are key to identifying areas of misinformation and establishing knowledge levels, thus guiding educational programmes and interventions. A three-step literature search was undertaken to identify measures of knowledge in dementia. An evaluation framework was employed articulating quality indicators for the psychometric properties of measures, based on their development and use within research studies. Five measures were identified: the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Test (ADKT, Dieckmann et al., 1988); the University of Alabama Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Test for Health Professionals (UAB-ADKT, Barrett et al., 1997); the Dementia Quiz (DQ, Gilleard and Groom, 1994); the Knowledge of Aging and Memory Loss and Care (KAML-C, Kuhn et al., 2005) and the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale (ADKS, Carpenter et al., 2009). All measures followed a standard scale development process, generally with acceptable reliability and validity. Many studies used measures on populations beyond the target sample, without re-establishing the psychometric properties of the scales. There are limitations with all the measures, including weaknesses in psychometric properties, being outdated and having limited scope. Although the ADKT was once suited to international use and has established psychometric properties, some items are now outdated. The ADKS positions itself as an updated version of the ADKT, yet has not been used beyond the original development study. The DQ is most the suitable for family carers. All measures require periodic updates, to keep pace with the expanding field of dementia. More robust, contemporary measures of knowledge are required.

摘要

了解痴呆症的评估工具对于确定错误信息领域和建立知识水平至关重要,从而指导教育计划和干预措施。我们进行了三步文献检索,以确定痴呆症知识评估工具。我们采用了一个评估框架,根据研究中工具的开发和使用情况,阐述了心理计量特性的质量指标。确定了五种评估工具:阿尔茨海默病知识测试(ADKT,Dieckmann 等人,1988 年);阿拉巴马大学阿尔茨海默病知识测试(UAB-ADKT,Barrett 等人,1997 年);痴呆症测试(DQ,Gilleard 和 Groom,1994 年);衰老和记忆丧失与护理知识(KAML-C,Kuhn 等人,2005 年)和阿尔茨海默病知识量表(ADKS,Carpenter 等人,2009 年)。所有的评估工具都遵循标准的量表开发过程,通常具有可接受的信度和效度。许多研究使用的评估工具的测试对象超出了目标人群,而没有重新建立量表的心理计量特性。所有的评估工具都存在局限性,包括心理计量特性较弱、过时和范围有限等问题。虽然 ADKT 曾经适合国际使用且具有已建立的心理计量特性,但现在有些项目已经过时。ADKS 认为自己是 ADKT 的更新版本,但除了最初的开发研究之外,尚未在其他地方使用过。DQ 最适合家庭照顾者。所有的评估工具都需要定期更新,以跟上痴呆症领域的扩展。需要更强大、更现代的知识评估工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验