• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊腹腔镜子宫切除术:疼痛评估

Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of pain.

作者信息

Gauta Joseph

机构信息

Naples Day Surgery, Naples, Florida, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):346-9. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13125733356558.

DOI:10.4293/108680811X13125733356558
PMID:21985722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3183569/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in patient pain postoperatively, comparing 2 types of outpatient hysterectomy procedures.

METHODS

This is a nonblind, nonrandomized, prospective study of surgeries performed at 1 ambulatory surgery center by 1 surgeon over 14 months. Patient pain was assessed using a visual analog scale before and after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients were followed through a 2-week postoperative period.

RESULTS

Nineteen laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies and 17 total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed. The 2 groups were similar in age, BMI, uterine weight, and surgical time. Comparing the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in pain throughout any time points of the study.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences in pain during the postoperative period between the 2 groups. Outpatient hysterectomy is a safe procedure that may improve patient satisfaction surgically and financially, and either approach is well tolerated by patients.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在比较两种门诊子宫切除手术方式,评估患者术后疼痛的差异。

方法

这是一项在1个门诊手术中心由1名外科医生在14个月内进行的非盲、非随机前瞻性手术研究。在腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术和全腹腔镜子宫切除术前后,使用视觉模拟量表评估患者疼痛情况。对患者进行为期2周的术后随访。

结果

共进行了19例腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术和17例全腹腔镜子宫切除术。两组在年龄、体重指数、子宫重量和手术时间方面相似。比较两组,在研究的任何时间点,疼痛均无统计学显著差异。

结论

两组术后疼痛无统计学显著差异。门诊子宫切除术是一种安全的手术方式,在手术和经济方面可能提高患者满意度,且两种方法患者耐受性均良好。

相似文献

1
Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of pain.门诊腹腔镜子宫切除术:疼痛评估
JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):346-9. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13125733356558.
2
[Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy, feasibility and morbidity: an observational study on thirty patients].
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Feb;42(2):67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
3
Less postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy than after vaginal hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术术后疼痛少于阴道子宫切除术。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;292(1):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3608-7. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial (LAVA).腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的前瞻性、随机、多中心、双盲试验(LAVA)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4647-7. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.腹腔镜单孔子宫切除术的随机对照比较:全腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jul;25(7):541-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0524. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
6
Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):895-901.
7
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy with some vaginal component versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.腹腔镜单孔全子宫切除术的比较:带有部分阴道操作的腹腔镜全子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Apr;24(4):254-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0507. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
8
Vaginal and Laparoscopic hysterectomy as an outpatient procedure: A systematic review.门诊阴道及腹腔镜子宫切除术:一项系统评价
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:212-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
9
Outpatient vs inpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.门诊与住院腹腔镜全子宫切除术的随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Nov;98(11):1420-1428. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13670. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
10
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case control comparative study with total abdominal hysterectomy.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Feb;1(2):116-21. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80773-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ropivacaine use in laparoscopic hysterectomy.罗哌卡因在腹腔镜子宫切除术中应用的系统评价与荟萃分析
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar 12;18(1):56-64. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.06606.
2
Laparoscopic Hysterectomies: Our 10 Years Experience in a Single Laparoscopic Center.腹腔镜子宫切除术:我们在单一腹腔镜中心的10年经验。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Aug;66(4):274-81. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0665-6. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
3
Ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for patients undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a retrospective study.超声引导下脂质体布比卡因肋下腹横肌平面浸润用于机器人辅助子宫切除术患者:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jun;25(5):937-41. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000429.
4
Advanced gynecologic laparoscopy in a fast-track ambulatory surgery center.快速通道门诊手术中心的高级妇科腹腔镜检查
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00291.

本文引用的文献

1
Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):26.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
2
Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.全国范围使用腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹和经阴道途径的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222.
3
Inpatient hospitalization for gynecologic disorders in the United States.美国妇科疾病的住院治疗情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):541.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.12.013. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
4
Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy.机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):364-9.
5
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
6
Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.2003年美国子宫切除术的发生率
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.
7
Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in a rural ambulatory surgery center.农村门诊手术中心的门诊腹腔镜子宫切除术。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Aug;11(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60051-5.
8
Outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy.门诊全腹腔镜子宫切除术
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Nov;10(4):481-3. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60149-1.
9
Inpatient hospital admission and death after outpatient surgery in elderly patients: importance of patient and system characteristics and location of care.老年患者门诊手术后的住院治疗与死亡:患者及系统特征与护理地点的重要性
Arch Surg. 2004 Jan;139(1):67-72. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.1.67.
10
A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术在适合腹式子宫切除术患者中的多中心随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;92(3):321-6.