Kallar S, Pandit I K, Srivastava N, Gugnani N
Department of Pedodontics, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozepur, Punjab, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jul-Sep;29(3):235-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.85832.
The present study was undertaken to determine and compare the efficacy of manual and powered toothbrushes under supervised and unsupervised conditions in 200 school-going children between 6 and 13 years of age. Two hundred school-going children aged between 6 and 13 years were selected. Children were randomly divided into two groups of 100 in each. Group 1 children were given manual brushes, while group 2 children were given powered brushes. The groups were further divided into two subgroups, with supervised brushing in subgroup A and unsupervised brushing in subgroup B. At 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks, plaque was recorded according to Turseky-Gilmore-Glickman modification of Quingley Hein index and oral hygiene performance index. Data were statistically analyzed. Both brushes significantly reduced the plaque accumulation, though to different degrees. Powered brushes showed significant plaque reduction as compared to the manual brushes. Supervised group of both brushes showed a greater plaque reduction.
本研究旨在确定并比较手动牙刷和电动牙刷在有监督和无监督条件下,对200名6至13岁学童的功效。选取了200名6至13岁的学童。儿童被随机分为两组,每组100人。第1组儿童使用手动牙刷,第2组儿童使用电动牙刷。每组又进一步分为两个亚组,A亚组为有监督刷牙,B亚组为无监督刷牙。在第3、6、9和12周,根据Quingley Hein指数的Turseky-Gilmore-Glickman改良版记录菌斑,并记录口腔卫生表现指数。对数据进行统计学分析。两种牙刷均显著减少了菌斑堆积,不过程度不同。与手动牙刷相比,电动牙刷使菌斑显著减少。两种牙刷的有监督组菌斑减少幅度更大。