Heintze Siegward D, Zimmerli Brigitte
Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein.
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2011;121(9):804-16.
The first part of this three-part review on the relevance of laboratory testing of composites and adhesives deals with approval requirements for composite materials. We compare the in vivo and in vitro literature data and discuss the relevance of in vitro analyses. The standardized ISO protocols are presented, with a focus on the evaluation of physical parameters. These tests all have a standardized protocol that describes the entire test set-up. The tests analyse flexural strength, depth of cure, susceptibility to ambient light, color stability, water sorption and solubility, and radiopacity. Some tests have a clinical correlation. A high flexural strength, for instance, decreases the risk of fractures of the marginal ridge in posterior restorations and incisal edge build-ups of restored anterior teeth. Other tests do not have a clinical correlation or the threshold values are too low, which results in an approval of materials that show inferior clinical properties (e.g., radiopacity). It is advantageous to know the test set-ups and the ideal threshold values to correctly interpret the material data. Overall, however, laboratory assessment alone cannot ensure the clinical success of a product.
这篇关于复合材料和粘合剂实验室测试相关性的三部分综述的第一部分,涉及复合材料的批准要求。我们比较了体内和体外的文献数据,并讨论了体外分析的相关性。介绍了标准化的ISO协议,重点是物理参数的评估。这些测试都有一个标准化的协议,描述了整个测试设置。这些测试分析弯曲强度、固化深度、对环境光的敏感性、颜色稳定性、吸水性和溶解性以及射线不透性。一些测试具有临床相关性。例如,高弯曲强度可降低后牙修复体边缘嵴骨折和修复前牙切缘堆积骨折的风险。其他测试没有临床相关性,或者阈值过低,这导致批准了临床性能较差的材料(如射线不透性)。了解测试设置和理想阈值有助于正确解释材料数据。然而,总体而言,仅靠实验室评估并不能确保产品在临床上取得成功。