• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宗教/灵性的简明多维测量的聚合/发散有效性:情感联系作为“灵性”结构的实证支持。

Convergent/Divergent validity of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality: empirical support for emotional connectedness as a "spiritual" construct.

机构信息

Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2012 Jun;51(2):529-41. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9538-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-011-9538-9
PMID:21989650
Abstract

The objective of this article is to determine the convergent/divergent validity of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS; Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group 1999) subscales by correlating it with the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) Self-Transcendence subscales (i.e., Mysticism, Transpersonal Identification, Self-Forgetfulness; Cloninger et al. 1994). The cross-sectional analysis of 97 undergraduate/graduate students from a Midwestern university was made. The results are (1) all five BMMRS spirituality subscales were significantly correlated with the TCI Mysticism scale; (2) two BMMRS scales (i.e., Daily Spiritual Experiences, Values/Beliefs) were significantly correlated with the TCI Transpersonal Identification scales; (3) no BMMRS spiritual subscales were significantly correlated with the TCI Self-Forgetfulness scale; and (4) of the BMMRS religion scales, only the Organizational Religiousness subscale was correlated with any TCI subscale (i.e., Mysticism). The BMMRS appears to have adequate convergent/divergent validity, although the need exists to determine specific dimensions of spirituality. Inspection of the specific items of the BMMRS and TCI spiritual subscales that were most consistently correlated (i.e., BMMRS Daily Spiritual Experiences, Values/Beliefs; TCI Mysticism, Transpersonal Identification) suggests the existence of a distinct spiritual construct that is best conceptualized as the experience of emotional connectedness to the divine, nature, and/or others.

摘要

本文旨在通过与性格与气质量表(TCI)的自我超越分量表(即神秘主义、超个人认同、忘我;Cloninger 等人,1994 年)相关联,来确定简要多维宗教/精神量表(BMMRS;Fetzer 研究所和国家老龄问题研究所工作组,1999 年)分量表的会聚/发散有效性。对来自中西部一所大学的 97 名本科生/研究生进行了横断面分析。结果是:(1)BMMRS 所有五个精神分量表均与 TCI 神秘主义量表显著相关;(2)BMMRS 的两个量表(即日常精神体验、价值观/信念)与 TCI 超个人认同量表显著相关;(3)BMMRS 没有精神分量表与 TCI 忘我量表显著相关;(4)BMMRS 的宗教量表中,只有组织宗教量表与任何 TCI 量表(即神秘主义)相关。BMMRS 似乎具有足够的会聚/发散有效性,尽管需要确定精神的具体维度。对 BMMRS 和 TCI 精神分量表中最一致相关的特定项目(即 BMMRS 日常精神体验、价值观/信念;TCI 神秘主义、超个人认同)进行检查表明,存在一种独特的精神结构,最好将其概念化为与神性、自然和/或他人的情感联系体验。

相似文献

1
Convergent/Divergent validity of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality: empirical support for emotional connectedness as a "spiritual" construct.宗教/灵性的简明多维测量的聚合/发散有效性:情感联系作为“灵性”结构的实证支持。
J Relig Health. 2012 Jun;51(2):529-41. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9538-9.
2
Reliability and validity of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality among adolescents.青少年宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的信效度
J Relig Health. 2008 Dec;47(4):438-57. doi: 10.1007/s10943-007-9154-x.
3
Religiosity dimensions and subjective health status in Greek students.希腊学生的宗教信仰维度与主观健康状况
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jan-Mar;26(1):38-44.
4
Relationships between the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality and health outcomes for a heterogeneous rehabilitation population.宗教/精神信仰的简明多维测量与异质康复人群健康结果之间的关系。
Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Nov;54(4):422-431. doi: 10.1037/a0017758.
5
Validating a measure of religiousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians.验证一项针对夏威夷原住民的宗教信仰/精神性测量方法。
Pac Health Dialog. 2001 Sep;8(2):407-16.
6
Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality in US and Indian Samples with Traumatic Brain Injury.美国和印度创伤性脑损伤样本中宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的因素结构
J Relig Health. 2016 Apr;55(2):572-86. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0170-y.
7
Validation of Brief Multidimensional Spirituality/Religiousness Inventory (BMMRS) in Italian Adult Participants and in Participants with Medical Diseases.简短多维灵性/宗教性量表(BMMRS)在意大利成年参与者及患有医学疾病的参与者中的效度验证。
J Relig Health. 2017 Jun;56(3):907-915. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0285-9.
8
Brief multidimensional measure of spirituality/religiousness, self-esteem, quality of life, and epilepsy.简要多维的灵性/宗教信仰、自尊、生活质量和癫痫测量工具。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Mar;128:108578. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108578. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Validation of the Portuguese version of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS-P) in clinical and non-clinical samples.《宗教性/精神性简短多维量表》葡萄牙语版本(BMMRS-P)在临床和非临床样本中的验证。
J Relig Health. 2015 Apr;54(2):435-48. doi: 10.1007/s10943-013-9803-1.
10
Relationships among spirituality, religious practices, personality factors, and health for five different faith traditions.五种不同信仰传统中的灵性、宗教实践、人格因素与健康之间的关系。
J Relig Health. 2012 Dec;51(4):1017-41. doi: 10.1007/s10943-012-9615-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Cultural, Ethnic, and Religious Differences with the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness and Spirituality in the U.S. and India.考察美国和印度的多维宗教和精神信仰量表中文化、种族和宗教差异。
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3492-3506. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01433-0. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
"Test Your Spirituality in One Minute or Less" Structural Validity of the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-Being Short Version (MI-RSWB 12).《一分钟或更短时间内测试你的精神性》宗教/精神性福祉简版多维量表(MI-RSWB 12)的结构效度
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;12:597565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.597565. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Determining relationships between physical health and spiritual experience, religious practices, and congregational support in a heterogeneous medical sample.在一个异质的医疗样本中确定身体健康与精神体验、宗教实践和团体支持之间的关系。
J Relig Health. 2010 Mar;49(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9227-5. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
2
Re-conceptualizing the factor structure of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality.重新构想宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的因素结构。
J Relig Health. 2009 Jun;48(2):146-63. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9. Epub 2008 May 31.
3
Helping, spirituality and Alcoholics Anonymous in recovery.
Testing domains of the healing experiences in all life stressors questionnaire in a cohort of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected Chicago women.
在一组感染艾滋病毒和未感染艾滋病毒的芝加哥女性中,对“所有生活压力源问卷”中愈合经历的测试领域进行研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2017 Jul 4;10:201-208. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S129566. eCollection 2017.
4
Validation of Brief Multidimensional Spirituality/Religiousness Inventory (BMMRS) in Italian Adult Participants and in Participants with Medical Diseases.简短多维灵性/宗教性量表(BMMRS)在意大利成年参与者及患有医学疾病的参与者中的效度验证。
J Relig Health. 2017 Jun;56(3):907-915. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0285-9.
5
Achieving cultural congruency in weight loss interventions: can a spirituality-based program attract and retain an inner-city community sample?在减肥干预措施中实现文化一致性:一个基于灵性的项目能否吸引并留住市中心社区的样本群体?
J Obes. 2014;2014:641939. doi: 10.1155/2014/641939. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
康复过程中的帮助、灵性与戒酒互助会。
J Stud Alcohol. 2004 May;65(3):383-91. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.383.
4
How the mind hurts and heals the body.心智如何伤害与治愈身体。
Am Psychol. 2004 Jan;59(1):29-40. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.29.
5
Religion and spirituality. Linkages to physical health.宗教与精神信仰。与身体健康的联系。
Am Psychol. 2003 Jan;58(1):36-52. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.36.
6
Spirituality, religion, and health. An emerging research field.精神性、宗教与健康。一个新兴的研究领域。
Am Psychol. 2003 Jan;58(1):24-35. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.24.
7
Dimensions of religiosity and their relationship to lifetime psychiatric and substance use disorders.宗教信仰的维度及其与终生精神疾病和物质使用障碍的关系。
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;160(3):496-503. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.3.496.
8
Validating a measure of religiousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians.验证一项针对夏威夷原住民的宗教信仰/精神性测量方法。
Pac Health Dialog. 2001 Sep;8(2):407-16.
9
The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data.每日精神体验量表:开发、理论描述、信度、探索性因素分析以及使用健康相关数据的初步结构效度
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Winter;24(1):22-33. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04.
10
The many methods of religious coping: development and initial validation of the RCOPE.宗教应对的多种方式:宗教应对量表(RCOPE)的编制与初步验证
J Clin Psychol. 2000 Apr;56(4):519-43. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::aid-jclp6>3.0.co;2-1.