Johnstone Brick, Bhushan Braj, Hanks Robin, Yoon Dong Pil, Cohen Daniel
Department of Health Psychology, DC 116.88, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
J Relig Health. 2016 Apr;55(2):572-86. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0170-y.
The aim of this paper was to determine the factor structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS) based on a sample of individuals from diverse cultures (i.e., USA, India), ethnicities (i.e., Caucasian, African-American, South Asian), and religions (i.e., Christian, Muslim, Hindu). A total of 109 individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were included. Participants completed the BMMRS as part of a broader study on spirituality, religion, prosocial behaviors, and neuropsychological function. A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization identified a six-factor solution accounting for 72% of the variance in scores. Five of the factors were deemed to be interpretable and were labeled based on face validity as: (1) Positive Spirituality/Religious Practices; (2) Positive Congregational Support; (3) Negative Spirituality/Negative Congregational Support; (4) Organizational Religion; and (5) Forgiveness. The results were generally consistent with previous studies, suggesting the existence of universal religious, spiritual, and congregational support factors across different cultures and faith traditions. For health outcomes research, it is suggested that the BMMRS factors may be best conceptualized as measuring the following general domains: (a) emotional connectedness with a higher power (i.e., spirituality, positive/negative); (b) culturally based behavioral practices (i.e., religion); and (c) social support (i.e., positive/negative). The results indicate that factor relationships may differ among spiritual, religious, and congregational support variables according to culture and/or religious tradition.
本文的目的是基于来自不同文化(即美国、印度)、种族(即白种人、非裔美国人、南亚人)和宗教(即基督教、穆斯林、印度教)的个体样本,确定宗教性/精神性简短多维量表(BMMRS)的因子结构。总共纳入了109名创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者。参与者完成了BMMRS,作为一项关于精神性、宗教、亲社会行为和神经心理功能的更广泛研究的一部分。采用方差最大化旋转和凯泽标准化的主成分因子分析确定了一个六因子解决方案,该方案解释了分数方差的72%。其中五个因子被认为是可解释的,并根据表面效度标记为:(1)积极精神性/宗教实践;(2)积极会众支持;(3)消极精神性/消极会众支持;(4)组织宗教;(5)宽恕。结果与先前的研究总体一致,表明在不同文化和信仰传统中存在普遍的宗教、精神和会众支持因子。对于健康结果研究,建议将BMMRS因子最好概念化为测量以下一般领域:(a)与更高力量的情感联系(即精神性,积极/消极);(b)基于文化的行为实践(即宗教);(c)社会支持(即积极/消极)。结果表明,根据文化和/或宗教传统,精神、宗教和会众支持变量之间的因子关系可能会有所不同。