• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和印度创伤性脑损伤样本中宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的因素结构

Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality in US and Indian Samples with Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Johnstone Brick, Bhushan Braj, Hanks Robin, Yoon Dong Pil, Cohen Daniel

机构信息

Department of Health Psychology, DC 116.88, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.

Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2016 Apr;55(2):572-86. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0170-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-015-0170-y
PMID:26708139
Abstract

The aim of this paper was to determine the factor structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS) based on a sample of individuals from diverse cultures (i.e., USA, India), ethnicities (i.e., Caucasian, African-American, South Asian), and religions (i.e., Christian, Muslim, Hindu). A total of 109 individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were included. Participants completed the BMMRS as part of a broader study on spirituality, religion, prosocial behaviors, and neuropsychological function. A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization identified a six-factor solution accounting for 72% of the variance in scores. Five of the factors were deemed to be interpretable and were labeled based on face validity as: (1) Positive Spirituality/Religious Practices; (2) Positive Congregational Support; (3) Negative Spirituality/Negative Congregational Support; (4) Organizational Religion; and (5) Forgiveness. The results were generally consistent with previous studies, suggesting the existence of universal religious, spiritual, and congregational support factors across different cultures and faith traditions. For health outcomes research, it is suggested that the BMMRS factors may be best conceptualized as measuring the following general domains: (a) emotional connectedness with a higher power (i.e., spirituality, positive/negative); (b) culturally based behavioral practices (i.e., religion); and (c) social support (i.e., positive/negative). The results indicate that factor relationships may differ among spiritual, religious, and congregational support variables according to culture and/or religious tradition.

摘要

本文的目的是基于来自不同文化(即美国、印度)、种族(即白种人、非裔美国人、南亚人)和宗教(即基督教、穆斯林、印度教)的个体样本,确定宗教性/精神性简短多维量表(BMMRS)的因子结构。总共纳入了109名创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者。参与者完成了BMMRS,作为一项关于精神性、宗教、亲社会行为和神经心理功能的更广泛研究的一部分。采用方差最大化旋转和凯泽标准化的主成分因子分析确定了一个六因子解决方案,该方案解释了分数方差的72%。其中五个因子被认为是可解释的,并根据表面效度标记为:(1)积极精神性/宗教实践;(2)积极会众支持;(3)消极精神性/消极会众支持;(4)组织宗教;(5)宽恕。结果与先前的研究总体一致,表明在不同文化和信仰传统中存在普遍的宗教、精神和会众支持因子。对于健康结果研究,建议将BMMRS因子最好概念化为测量以下一般领域:(a)与更高力量的情感联系(即精神性,积极/消极);(b)基于文化的行为实践(即宗教);(c)社会支持(即积极/消极)。结果表明,根据文化和/或宗教传统,精神、宗教和会众支持变量之间的因子关系可能会有所不同。

相似文献

1
Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality in US and Indian Samples with Traumatic Brain Injury.美国和印度创伤性脑损伤样本中宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的因素结构
J Relig Health. 2016 Apr;55(2):572-86. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0170-y.
2
Re-conceptualizing the factor structure of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality.重新构想宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的因素结构。
J Relig Health. 2009 Jun;48(2):146-63. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9. Epub 2008 May 31.
3
Relationships between the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality and health outcomes for a heterogeneous rehabilitation population.宗教/精神信仰的简明多维测量与异质康复人群健康结果之间的关系。
Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Nov;54(4):422-431. doi: 10.1037/a0017758.
4
Examining Cultural, Ethnic, and Religious Differences with the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness and Spirituality in the U.S. and India.考察美国和印度的多维宗教和精神信仰量表中文化、种族和宗教差异。
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3492-3506. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01433-0. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
5
Relationships among spiritual beliefs, religious practises, congregational support and health for individuals with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的精神信仰、宗教活动、教会支持与健康之间的关系。
Brain Inj. 2009 May;23(5):411-9. doi: 10.1080/02699050902788501.
6
Convergent/Divergent validity of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality: empirical support for emotional connectedness as a "spiritual" construct.宗教/灵性的简明多维测量的聚合/发散有效性:情感联系作为“灵性”结构的实证支持。
J Relig Health. 2012 Jun;51(2):529-41. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9538-9.
7
Relationships among spirituality, religious practices, personality factors, and health for five different faith traditions.五种不同信仰传统中的灵性、宗教实践、人格因素与健康之间的关系。
J Relig Health. 2012 Dec;51(4):1017-41. doi: 10.1007/s10943-012-9615-8.
8
Reliability and validity of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality among adolescents.青少年宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的信效度
J Relig Health. 2008 Dec;47(4):438-57. doi: 10.1007/s10943-007-9154-x.
9
Religiosity dimensions and subjective health status in Greek students.希腊学生的宗教信仰维度与主观健康状况
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jan-Mar;26(1):38-44.
10
Validating a measure of religiousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians.验证一项针对夏威夷原住民的宗教信仰/精神性测量方法。
Pac Health Dialog. 2001 Sep;8(2):407-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Mental Wellness of Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Instruments.测量青少年的心理健康:工具的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:835601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835601. eCollection 2022.
2
Examining Cultural, Ethnic, and Religious Differences with the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness and Spirituality in the U.S. and India.考察美国和印度的多维宗教和精神信仰量表中文化、种族和宗教差异。
J Relig Health. 2022 Aug;61(4):3492-3506. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01433-0. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Spirituality as a scientific construct: testing its universality across cultures and languages.作为一种科学概念的灵性:检验其在不同文化和语言中的普遍性。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 3;10(3):e0117701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117701. eCollection 2015.
2
Relationships among spirituality, religious practices, personality factors, and health for five different faith traditions.五种不同信仰传统中的灵性、宗教实践、人格因素与健康之间的关系。
J Relig Health. 2012 Dec;51(4):1017-41. doi: 10.1007/s10943-012-9615-8.
3
Spirituality and health: is there a relationship?
灵性与健康:二者是否存在关联?
J Health Psychol. 1999 May;4(3):291-300. doi: 10.1177/135910539900400314.
4
Religion and spirituality in rehabilitation outcomes among individuals with traumatic brain injury.宗教和精神信仰对创伤性脑损伤患者康复结果的影响。
Rehabil Psychol. 2011 May;56(2):107-16. doi: 10.1037/a0023552.
5
Determining relationships between physical health and spiritual experience, religious practices, and congregational support in a heterogeneous medical sample.在一个异质的医疗样本中确定身体健康与精神体验、宗教实践和团体支持之间的关系。
J Relig Health. 2010 Mar;49(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9227-5. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
6
Re-conceptualizing the factor structure of the brief multidimensional measure of religiousness/spirituality.重新构想宗教性/精神性简短多维测量的因素结构。
J Relig Health. 2009 Jun;48(2):146-63. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9179-9. Epub 2008 May 31.
7
How the mind hurts and heals the body.心智如何伤害与治愈身体。
Am Psychol. 2004 Jan;59(1):29-40. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.29.
8
Validating a measure of religiousness/spirituality for Native Hawaiians.验证一项针对夏威夷原住民的宗教信仰/精神性测量方法。
Pac Health Dialog. 2001 Sep;8(2):407-16.
9
Distribution of services and supports for people with traumatic brain injury in rural and urban Missouri.密苏里州城乡地区创伤性脑损伤患者的服务与支持分布情况。
J Rural Health. 2002 Winter;18(1):109-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00882.x.