• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的结局和生活质量比较。

Outcome and quality of life in obese patients underwent laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy.

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01732-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-022-01732-7
PMID:35870908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9308293/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although obesity is a popular reason for choosing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA), however, the question of whether there is a difference remains. Our goal is to investigate if there is a difference between OA and LA in obese patients.

METHODS

Fifty-eight obese patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis according to ALVARDO score at department of surgery at Suez Canal university hospitals from March 2020 till August 2021 were included. The study participants were assigned in two groups LA and OA. This study aimed to comparing between LA and OA regarding intraoperative complications, length of hospital stays, post -operative pain, and rate of post-operative complications. Meanwhile, using SF-36 scoring questionnaire, the quality of life was compared between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were included in the present study (LG = 29 patients and OG = 29 patients). The early post-operative complications (within 30 days after surgery) were significantly lower in the LA group (5 patients out of 29) than the OA (11 patients out of 29). Additionally, lower incidence of complications was noticed in the LA group (2 out of 29 patients) compared to OA (6 patients out of 29) beyond 30 days after operation. Patients with laparoscopic surgery had statistically significant higher overall quality of life scores (SF-36) (72 ± 32) compared to open surgery patients (66 ± 35) 2 weeks after operation.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic procedure was associated with lower incidence of post operative complications. However, open appendectomy was superior for a shorter operative time. Laparoscopic approach is not only used for therapeutic purposes, but also it has a diagnostic role.

摘要

背景

虽然肥胖是选择腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的常见原因,但仍存在差异的问题。我们的目标是研究肥胖患者中 OA 和 LA 之间是否存在差异。

方法

本研究纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 8 月在苏伊士运河大学医院外科部门根据 ALVARDO 评分诊断为急性阑尾炎的 58 例肥胖患者。研究参与者被分为 LA 和 OA 两组。本研究旨在比较 LA 和 OA 之间的术中并发症、住院时间、术后疼痛和术后并发症发生率。同时,使用 SF-36 评分问卷比较两组之间的生活质量。

结果

本研究共纳入 58 例患者(LG = 29 例,OG = 29 例)。LA 组(5 例中有 29 例)的早期术后并发症(术后 30 天内)明显低于 OA 组(11 例中有 29 例)。此外,LA 组(29 例中有 2 例)在术后 30 天后的并发症发生率明显低于 OA 组(29 例中有 6 例)。腹腔镜手术患者的总体生活质量评分(SF-36)(72 ± 32)明显高于开腹手术患者(66 ± 35)术后 2 周。

结论

腹腔镜手术与术后并发症发生率较低相关。然而,开腹手术的手术时间更短。腹腔镜方法不仅用于治疗目的,而且具有诊断作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9308293/0ed6936565ed/12893_2022_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9308293/0ed6936565ed/12893_2022_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9308293/0ed6936565ed/12893_2022_1732_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome and quality of life in obese patients underwent laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy.肥胖患者行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的结局和生活质量比较。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01732-7.
2
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
3
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
4
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的临床比较:历史队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
6
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.
7
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
8
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study.经腹式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的比较:基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6025-6031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10075-0. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肥胖人群急性非穿孔与穿孔阑尾炎的比较。
Am J Surg. 2011 Dec;202(6):733-8; discussion 738-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
10
Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study.针式内镜、腹腔镜及开放式阑尾切除术:一项对比研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Oct;11(5):306-12. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200110000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Complications Following Appendectomy in Obese Patients: A Single Tertiary Care Center Study.肥胖患者阑尾切除术后的手术并发症:一项单中心三级医疗中心研究。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74033. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Outcome of Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study From a Local Secondary Referral Hospital.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果:来自当地二级转诊医院的一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 16;16(11):e73791. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73791. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Awareness of Appendectomy and Its Complications Among Saudis.

本文引用的文献

1
An investigation into the factors predicting acute appendicitis and perforated appendicitis.探讨预测急性阑尾炎和穿孔性阑尾炎的因素。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021 Jul;27(4):434-442. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.60344.
2
Assessment of demographic, clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent appendectomy due to a presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis.评估因疑似急性阑尾炎而行阑尾切除术患者的人口统计学、临床和组织病理学特征。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021 May;27(3):315-324. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.73537.
3
Appendectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique.
沙特人对阑尾切除术及其并发症的认知
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46823. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46823. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
The Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes for Children Undergoing Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review.肥胖对急性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术儿童围手术期结局的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4811. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144811.
5
Relationship between body mass index and short-term postoperative prognosis in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.体重指数与结直肠癌手术患者术后短期预后的关系。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Apr 26;11(12):2766-2779. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2766.
肥胖症患者的阑尾切除术:腹腔镜与传统技术。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Dec 8;26:e928067. doi: 10.12659/MSM.928067.
4
Obesity and appendicitis: Laparoscopy versus open technique.肥胖与阑尾炎:腹腔镜手术与开放手术对比
Turk J Surg. 2020 Mar 18;36(1):105-109. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4714. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 12th national survey(2012-2013) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery.日本的内镜手术:日本内镜外科学会的第12次全国调查(2012 - 2013年)
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 Nov;10(4):345-353. doi: 10.1111/ases.12428. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review.作为健康相关生活质量单一衡量指标的SF-36总分:范围综述
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Oct 4;4:2050312116671725. doi: 10.1177/2050312116671725. eCollection 2016.
7
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理。2015年欧洲内镜外科学会共识发展会议
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review.腹腔镜阑尾切除术在肥胖患者中的应用与临床结局的改善相关:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.052. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术
J Visc Surg. 2014 Jun;151(3):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
10
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in obese patients: outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗肥胖患者的比较:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库的结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jul;215(1):88-99; discussion 99-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 May 24.