Suppr超能文献

临终选择和决策的感知风险:文献回顾。

Perceived risks around choice and decision making at end-of-life: a literature review.

机构信息

Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):38-53. doi: 10.1177/0269216311424632. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

the World Health Organization identifies meeting patient choice for care as central to effective palliative care delivery. Little is known about how choice, which implies an objective balancing of options and risks, is understood and enacted through decision making at end-of-life.

AIM

to explore how perceptions of 'risk' may inform decision-making processes at end-of-life.

DESIGN

an integrative literature review was conducted between January and February 2010. Papers were reviewed using Hawker et al.'s criteria and evaluated according to clarity of methods, analysis and evidence of ethical consideration. All literature was retained as background data, but given the significant international heterogeneity the final analysis specifically focused on the UK context.

DATA SOURCE

the databases Medline, PsycINFO, Assia, British Nursing Index, High Wire Press and CINAHL were explored using the search terms decision*, risk, anxiety, hospice and palliative care, end-of-life care and publication date of 1998-2010.

RESULTS

thematic analysis of 25 papers suggests that decision making at end-of-life is multifactorial, involving a balancing of risks related to caregiver support; service provider resources; health inequalities and access; challenges to information giving; and perceptions of self-identity. Overall there is a dissonance in understandings of choice and decision making between service providers and service users.

CONCLUSION

the concept of risk acknowledges the factors that shape and constrain end-of-life choices. Recognition of perceived risks as a central factor in decision making would be of value in acknowledging and supporting meaningful decision making processes for patients with palliative care needs and their families.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织认为满足患者对护理的选择是有效提供姑息治疗的核心。对于选择如何通过决策在生命末期得到理解和实施,即意味着对各种选择和风险进行客观权衡,我们知之甚少。

目的

探讨“风险”的认知如何为生命末期的决策过程提供信息。

设计

2010 年 1 月至 2 月进行了综合文献回顾。使用 Hawker 等人的标准审查论文,并根据方法、分析的清晰度和伦理考虑的证据进行评估。所有文献都作为背景数据保留,但鉴于显著的国际异质性,最终分析特别关注英国的情况。

资料来源

使用“决策*”、“风险”、“焦虑”、“临终关怀和姑息治疗”、“生命末期护理”和“1998-2010 年出版日期”等检索词,在 Medline、PsycINFO、Assia、英国护理索引、High Wire Press 和 CINAHL 数据库中进行了搜索。

结果

对 25 篇论文的主题分析表明,生命末期的决策是多因素的,涉及到平衡与照顾者支持相关的风险;服务提供者的资源;健康不平等和获得;信息提供的挑战;以及自我认同的认知。总体而言,服务提供者和服务使用者之间在对选择和决策的理解上存在分歧。

结论

风险概念承认了影响和限制生命末期选择的因素。认识到感知到的风险是决策的核心因素,这将有助于承认和支持有姑息治疗需求的患者及其家属的有意义的决策过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验