School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):823-38. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Engaged scholarship is an intellectual movement sweeping across higher education, not only in the social and behavioral sciences but also in fields of natural science and engineering. It is predicated on the idea that major advances in knowledge will transpire when scholars, while pursuing their research interests, also consider addressing the core problems confronting society. For a workable engaged agenda in science and technology studies, one that informs scholarship as well as shapes practice and policy, the traditional terms of engagement must be renegotiated to be more open and mutual than has historically characterized the nature of inquiry in this field. At the same time, it is essential to protect individual privacy and preserve government confidentiality. Yet there is a scientific possibility for and benefit to introducing more collaborative and deliberative research approaches between scholar and subject in ways that will not violate these first-order ethics. To make the case, this article discusses the possibilities and perils of engaged science and technology scholarship by drawing on our own recent experiences to conduct and apply STS research while embedded in the National Science Foundation. Brief accounts of these experiences reveal the opportunities as well as the challenges of engaged scholarship. They also provide lessons for those fellow travelers who might follow the authors to this or other like host organizations with ambitions of increasing fundamental knowledge about and applying research to the policies, programs, and decisions of the scientific enterprise.
参与式学术研究是一场席卷高等教育界的思想运动,不仅在社会科学和行为科学领域,而且在自然科学和工程领域也是如此。它的前提是,当学者在追求自己的研究兴趣的同时,也考虑解决社会面临的核心问题时,知识将取得重大进展。为了使科学技术研究领域的参与议程可行,既能为学术研究提供信息,又能影响实践和政策,就必须重新谈判传统的参与方式,使其比该领域历史上的探究性质更加开放和相互。同时,保护个人隐私和政府机密至关重要。然而,有一种科学的可能性和好处,即在不违反这些第一伦理的情况下,在学者和研究对象之间引入更多的合作和审议性研究方法。为了说明这一点,本文通过借鉴我们自己最近的经验,在国家科学基金会的支持下进行和应用 STS 研究,讨论了参与式科学和技术学术研究的可能性和风险。这些经验的简要说明揭示了参与式学术研究的机遇和挑战。它们也为那些可能跟随作者前往这些或其他类似主办组织的同行提供了经验教训,这些组织有志于增加对科学事业政策、项目和决策的基础认识并将研究应用于这些政策、项目和决策。