• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《自食其药:一场科学传播实验》

Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.

机构信息

Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 80, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):801-15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9306-y. Epub 2011 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-011-9306-y
PMID:21874582
Abstract

In 2007 a social scientist and a designer created a spatial installation to communicate social science research about the regulation of emerging science and technology. The rationale behind the experiment was to improve scientific knowledge production by making the researcher sensitive to new forms of reactions and objections. Based on an account of the conceptual background to the installation and the way it was designed, the paper discusses the nature of the engagement enacted through the experiment. It is argued that experimentation is a crucial way of making social science about science communication and engagement more robust.

摘要

2007 年,一位社会科学家和一位设计师共同创作了一个空间装置,旨在传播关于新兴科学技术监管的社会科学研究。这个实验的基本原理是通过让研究人员对新形式的反应和反对意见保持敏感,从而提高科学知识的生产。本文基于对该装置的概念背景和设计方式的描述,讨论了通过实验实现的互动的本质。本文认为,实验是使关于科学传播和参与的社会科学更稳健的关键方法。

相似文献

1
Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.《自食其药:一场科学传播实验》
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):801-15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9306-y. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
2
Experimenting with engagement : commentary on: Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.尝试参与:评论:服用我们自己的药:关于科学传播的一项实验。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):817-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9328-5. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
3
Recommendations for the role of social science research in One Health.关于社会科学研究在 One Health 中的作用的建议。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;129:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.048. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
4
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?理性的诱惑:为何缺陷模型在科学传播中持续存在?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.
5
The broad challenge of public engagement in science: commentary on: "Constitutional moments in governing science and technology".公众参与科学的广泛挑战:评“科学和技术治理中的宪法时刻”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):639-48. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9296-9. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
6
Why public dissemination of science matters: a manifesto.为什么科学的公众传播很重要:一份宣言。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 24;33(30):12147-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2556-13.2013.
7
Science, precaution, and the politics of technological risk: converging implications in evolutionary and social scientific perspectives.科学、预防措施与技术风险政治:进化科学与社会科学视角下的趋同影响
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1128:95-110. doi: 10.1196/annals.1399.011.
8
In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?在科学传播中,为何公众缺陷这一观念总是反复出现?医疗保健领域中不断变化的信息流如何影响科学传播的缺陷模型?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):427-32. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629746.
9
Communicating science in social settings.在社会环境中传播科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14040-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213275110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Natural science and medicine: social science and medicine: some methodological controversies.自然科学与医学:社会科学与医学:一些方法论上的争议。
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(6):643-57. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90454-3.

引用本文的文献

1
What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on 'Synthetic Aesthetics'.科技研究可以从艺术和设计中学到什么?对“合成美学”的反思。
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Apr;47(2):195-215. doi: 10.1177/0306312716678488. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
2
Communicating science in politicized environments.在政治化环境下传播科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14048-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212726110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
3
Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?社论综述:公共科技学者:与谁互动?

本文引用的文献

1
What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.实验室里发生的事情不会留在实验室里[更正]:应用中游调制增强实验室中的关键反射。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):769-88. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
2
Engaged, embedded, enjoined: science and technology studies in the National Science Foundation.参与、嵌入、约束:美国国家科学基金会的科学技术研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):823-38. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
3
Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):607-20. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9331-x. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
4
Experimenting with engagement : commentary on: Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.尝试参与:评论:服用我们自己的药:关于科学传播的一项实验。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):817-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9328-5. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
协商可能性:介入纳米技术的未来。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):723-37. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
4
Questioning 'participation': a critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a Flemish participatory technology assessment.质疑“参与”:对佛兰德参与式技术评估中其概念化的批判性评价。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):673-90. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9313-z. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
5
Cloning sensations: mass mediated articulation of social responses to controversial biotechnology.克隆热潮:大众传媒对有争议生物技术的社会反应的阐述
Public Underst Sci. 2005 Apr;14(2):185-200. doi: 10.1177/0963662505050994.