Suppr超能文献

美国的同性性行为:时间加速队列评估法(T-ACASI)对患病率估计的影响

SAME-GENDER SEX IN THE UNITED STATES IMPACT OF T-ACASI ON PREVALENCE ESTIMATES.

作者信息

Villarroel Maria A, Turner Charles F, Eggleston Elizabeth, Al-Tayyib Alia, Rogers Susan M, Roman Anthony M, Cooley Philip C, Gordek Harper

机构信息

Program in Health and Behavior Measurement, Research Triangle Institute (RTI), Washington, DC.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2006 Summer;70(2):166-196. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfj023.

Abstract

Well-conducted telephone surveys provide an economical means of estimating the prevalence of sexual and reproductive behaviors in a population. There is, however, a nontrivial potential for bias since respondents must report sensitive information to a human interviewer. The National STD and Behavior Measurement Experiment (NSBME) evaluates a new survey technology-telephone audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (T-ACASI)-that eliminates this requirement. The NSBME embedded a randomized experiment in a survey of probability samples of 1,543 U.S. and 744 Baltimore adults ages 18 to 45. Compared with NSBME respondents interviewed by human interviewers, respondents interviewed by T-ACASI were 1.5 to 1.6 times more likely to report same-gender sexual attraction, experience, and genital contact. The impact of T-ACASI was more pronounced (odds ratio = 2.5) for residents of locales that have historically been less tolerant of same-gender sexual behaviors and for respondents in households with children (odds ratio = 3.0).

摘要

精心开展的电话调查为估计人群中性行为和生殖行为的流行率提供了一种经济的方法。然而,由于受访者必须向人类访谈员报告敏感信息,因此存在不小的偏差可能性。国家性传播疾病与行为测量实验(NSBME)评估了一种新的调查技术——电话音频计算机辅助自我访谈(T-ACASI),该技术消除了这一要求。NSBME在一项对1543名美国成年人和744名巴尔的摩18至45岁成年人的概率样本调查中嵌入了一项随机实验。与由人类访谈员访谈的NSBME受访者相比,由T-ACASI访谈的受访者报告同性性吸引力、经历和生殖器接触的可能性要高出1.5至1.6倍。对于历史上对同性性行为容忍度较低地区的居民以及有孩子家庭的受访者,T-ACASI的影响更为显著(优势比=2.5)(优势比=3.0)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Asking Survey Questions About Criminal Justice Involvement.询问关于刑事司法参与的调查问题。
Public Health Rep. 2019 May/Jun;134(1_suppl):46S-56S. doi: 10.1177/0033354919826566.
8
For data's sake: dilemmas in the measurement of gender minorities.为了数据:性别少数群体测量中的困境。
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Dec;20(12):1362-1377. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1437220. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验