Gaskin Gregory L, Longhurst Christopher A, Slayton Rebecca, Das Amar K
Program in Science, Technology and Society, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2(4):406-419. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-06-RA-0035.
To analyze sociotechnical issues involved in the process of developing an interoperable commercial Personal Health Record (PHR) in a hospital setting, and to create guidelines for future PHR implementations. METHODS: This qualitative study utilized observational research and semi-structured interviews with 8 members of the hospital team, as gathered over a 28 week period of developing and adapting a vendor-based PHR at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford University. A grounded theory approach was utilized to code and analyze over 100 pages of typewritten field notes and interview transcripts. This grounded analysis allowed themes to surface during the data collection process which were subsequently explored in greater detail in the observations and interviews. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged: (1) Multidisciplinary teamwork helped team members identify crucial features of the PHR; (2) Divergent goals for the PHR existed even within the hospital team; (3) Differing organizational conceptions of the end-user between the hospital and software company differentially shaped expectations for the final product; (4) Difficulties with coordination and accountability between the hospital and software company caused major delays and expenses and strained the relationship between hospital and software vendor. CONCLUSIONS: Though commercial interoperable PHRs have great potential to improve healthcare, the process of designing and developing such systems is an inherently sociotechnical process with many complex issues and barriers. This paper offers recommendations based on the lessons learned to guide future development of such PHRs.
分析在医院环境中开发可互操作的商业个人健康记录(PHR)过程中涉及的社会技术问题,并为未来的PHR实施制定指导方针。方法:这项定性研究采用了观察性研究以及对医院团队的8名成员进行半结构化访谈,这些数据是在斯坦福大学露西尔·帕卡德儿童医院开发和适配基于供应商的PHR的28周期间收集的。采用扎根理论方法对100多页的打字实地笔记和访谈记录进行编码和分析。这种扎根分析使主题在数据收集过程中浮现出来,随后在观察和访谈中进行更详细的探讨。结果:出现了四个主要主题:(1)多学科团队合作帮助团队成员确定PHR的关键特征;(2)即使在医院团队内部,对PHR也存在不同的目标;(3)医院和软件公司对最终用户的组织概念不同,对最终产品的期望也不同;(4)医院和软件公司之间协调和问责方面的困难导致了重大延误和费用,并使医院与软件供应商之间的关系紧张。结论:尽管商业可互操作的PHR有很大潜力改善医疗保健,但设计和开发此类系统的过程本质上是一个社会技术过程,存在许多复杂问题和障碍。本文根据所吸取的经验教训提出建议,以指导此类PHR的未来发展。