• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sociotechnical challenges to developing technologies for patient access to health information exchange data.开发患者获取健康信息交换数据技术的社会技术挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):664-70. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002073. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
2
A case report in health information exchange for inter-organizational patient transfers.一份关于跨组织患者转诊的健康信息交换的病例报告。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Jul 16;5(3):642-50. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-02-CR-0016. eCollection 2014.
3
At the crossroads: NRTRC white paper examines trends driving the convergence of telehealth, EHRs and HIE.处于十字路口:国家远程医疗研究与转化中心白皮书探讨推动远程医疗、电子健康记录和健康信息交换融合的趋势。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2010;46(4):17-23.
4
Health information exchange implementation: lessons learned and critical success factors from a case study.健康信息交换实施:案例研究中的经验教训和关键成功因素。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;2(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3455.
5
Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.消费者对互联网用于个人健康记录和健康信息交换的认知与使用:2007年健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 18;12(4):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1668.
6
Electronic health information exchange in underserved settings: examining initiatives in small physician practices & community health centers.医疗服务欠缺地区的电子健康信息交换:审视小型医师诊所和社区健康中心的相关举措。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 21;14:415. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-415.
7
Successes and Barriers of Health Information Exchange Participation Across Hospitals in South Carolina From 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal Observational Study.2014年至2020年南卡罗来纳州各医院健康信息交换参与情况的成功与障碍:纵向观察研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Sep 28;11:e40959. doi: 10.2196/40959.
8
Differing Strategies to Meet Information-Sharing Needs: Publicly Supported Community Health Information Exchanges Versus Health Systems' Enterprise Health Information Exchanges.满足信息共享需求的不同策略:公共支持的社区健康信息交换与卫生系统的企业健康信息交换
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):77-108. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12180.
9
Comparison of consumers' perspectives on different health information exchange (HIE) mechanisms: an experimental study.比较消费者对不同健康信息交换(HIE)机制的看法:一项实验研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Nov;119:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Consumer Opinions of Health Information Exchange, e-Prescribing, and Personal Health Records.消费者对健康信息交换、电子处方和个人健康记录的看法。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Nov 1;12(Fall):1e. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
A study on user willingness to participate in an adverse drug event information sharing system.一项关于用户参与药物不良事件信息共享系统意愿的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2837. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20353-8.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Digital Health Tools Faced by South Asian Canadians in Surrey, British Columbia: Community-Based Participatory Action Exploration Using Photovoice.不列颠哥伦比亚省萨里市的南亚裔加拿大人在获取数字健康工具方面面临的障碍与促进因素:运用照片声音法进行基于社区的参与式行动探索
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 13;24(1):e25863. doi: 10.2196/25863.
3
Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.信息学中定性研究发表指南。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2743-2748. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab195.
4
"Engaging stakeholders in integrating social determinants of health into electronic health records: a scoping review"."让利益相关者参与将健康的社会决定因素纳入电子健康记录:范围综述"。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2021 Dec;80(1):1943983. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2021.1943983.
5
Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records-A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands.影响患者获取电子健康记录的发展与实施的因素——瑞典与荷兰的比较研究
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;9:621210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.621210. eCollection 2021.
6
Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.计算机化临床决策支持系统与护理质量的绝对改善:对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3216. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3216.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of eHealth Services: Systematic Literature Analysis.电子健康服务实施的障碍与促进因素:系统文献分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 22;21(11):e14197. doi: 10.2196/14197.
8
Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.心理健康背景下健康信息交换中的患者隐私视角:定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Nov 13;6(11):e13306. doi: 10.2196/13306.
9
Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.连接美国的健康数据系统:收益面临的挑战。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Oct 14;4(4):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.09.006. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
10
Falling short: how state laws can address health information exchange barriers and enablers.不尽如人意:州法律如何解决健康信息交换障碍和促进因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jun 1;25(6):635-644. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx122.

本文引用的文献

1
A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health.国家行动计划,通过电子健康支持消费者参与。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):376-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1216.
2
A proposed 'health literate care model' would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care.提出的“健康素养护理模式”将构成一种改善患者参与护理的系统方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):357-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205.
3
Blue Button gains fans, apps. Simple tech from VA puts interoperability to work.“蓝纽扣”赢得粉丝与应用程序。退伍军人事务部的简单技术实现了互操作性。
Mod Healthc. 2012 Oct 15;42(42):14.
4
Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.《健康信息技术:电子健康记录技术的标准、实施规范及认证标准,2014年版;健康信息技术永久认证计划的修订》。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Sep 4;77(171):54163-292.
5
How are health professionals using health information exchange systems? Measuring usage for evaluation and system improvement.卫生专业人员如何使用健康信息交换系统?衡量使用情况以进行评估和系统改进。
J Med Syst. 2012 Oct;36(5):3195-204. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9810-2. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
6
The challenges in making electronic health records accessible to patients.使电子健康记录可供患者使用所面临的挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):116-20. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000261. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
Sociotechnical Challenges of Developing an Interoperable Personal Health Record: Lessons Learned.开发可互操作个人健康记录的社会技术挑战:经验教训
Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2(4):406-419. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-06-RA-0035.
8
Electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among hospitals in New York State.纽约州医院的电子健康记录采用和健康信息交换。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1156-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01755.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
9
Health information exchange usage in emergency departments and clinics: the who, what, and why.卫生信息在急诊部和诊所的交流使用:谁,什么,为什么。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):690-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000308.
10
Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing?健康信息交换:我们为什么要这样做,以及我们在做什么?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):678-82. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000021. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

开发患者获取健康信息交换数据技术的社会技术挑战。

Sociotechnical challenges to developing technologies for patient access to health information exchange data.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medical College, Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, New York, USA Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), New York, New York, USA.

Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):664-70. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002073. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002073
PMID:24064443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4078272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing patients with access to their medical data is widely expected to help educate and empower them to manage their own health. Health information exchange (HIE) infrastructures could potentially help patients access records across multiple healthcare providers. We studied three HIE organizations as they developed portals to give consumers access to HIE data previously exchanged only among healthcare organizations.

OBJECTIVE

To follow the development of new consumer portal technologies, and to identify barriers and facilitators to patient access to HIE data.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews of 15 key informants over a 2-year period spanning the development and early implementation of three new projects, coded according to a sociotechnical framework.

RESULTS

As the organizations tried to develop functionality that fully served the needs of both providers and patients, plans were altered by technical barriers (primarily related to data standardization) and cultural and legal issues surrounding data access. Organizational changes also played an important role in altering project plans. In all three cases, patient access to data was significantly scaled back from initial plans.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study revealed how sociotechnical factors previously identified as important in health information technology success and failure helped to shape the evolution of three novel consumer informatics projects. Barriers to providing patients with seamless access to their HIE data were multifactorial. Remedies will have to address technical, organizational, cultural, and other factors.

摘要

背景

让患者获得自己的医疗数据,被广泛认为有助于教育和增强他们管理自己健康的能力。健康信息交换 (HIE) 基础设施有可能帮助患者访问多个医疗服务提供者的记录。我们研究了三个 HIE 组织,因为它们正在开发门户,以便消费者可以访问之前仅在医疗保健组织之间交换的 HIE 数据。

目的

跟踪新的消费者门户技术的发展,并确定患者访问 HIE 数据的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对 15 名关键信息提供者进行了为期 2 年的半结构化访谈,跨越了三个新项目的开发和早期实施,根据社会技术框架进行了编码。

结果

随着组织试图开发既能充分满足提供者又能满足患者需求的功能,技术障碍(主要与数据标准化有关)以及围绕数据访问的文化和法律问题改变了计划。组织变革也在改变项目计划方面发挥了重要作用。在所有三种情况下,患者对数据的访问都大大缩减了最初的计划。

结论

这项前瞻性研究揭示了以前被确定为健康信息技术成功和失败的重要因素的社会技术因素如何帮助塑造了三个新的消费者信息学项目的演变。为患者提供无缝访问其 HIE 数据的障碍是多方面的。补救措施必须解决技术、组织、文化和其他因素。