Lyashchenko Konstantin P, Greenwald Rena, Esfandiari Javan, Rhodes Shelley, Dean Gillian, de la Rua-Domenech Ricardo, Meylan Mireille, Vordermeier H Martin, Zanolari Patrik
Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc., 3661 Horseblock Road, Medford, NY 11763, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Dec;18(12):2143-7. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05386-11. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Tuberculosis (TB) in South American camelids (SAC) is caused by Mycobacterium bovis or Mycobacterium microti. Two serological methods, rapid testing (RT) and the dual-path platform (DPP) assay, were evaluated using naturally infected SAC. The study population included 156 alpacas and 175 llamas in Great Britain, Switzerland, and the United States. TB due to M. bovis (n = 44) or M. microti (n = 8) in 35 alpacas and 17 llamas was diagnosed by gross pathology examination and culture. Control animals were from herds with no TB history. The RT and the DPP assay showed sensitivities of 71% and 74%, respectively, for alpacas, while the sensitivity for llamas was 77% for both assays. The specificity of the DPP assay (98%) was higher than that of RT (94%) for llamas; the specificities of the two assays were identical (98%) for alpacas. When the two antibody tests were combined, the parallel-testing interpretation (applied when either assay produced a positive result) enhanced the sensitivities of antibody detection to 89% for alpacas and 88% for llamas but at the cost of lower specificities (97% and 93%, respectively), whereas the serial-testing interpretation (applied when both assays produced a positive result) maximized the specificity to 100% for both SAC species, although the sensitivities were 57% for alpacas and 65% for llamas. Over 95% of the animals with evidence of TB failed to produce skin test reactions, thus confirming concerns about the validity of this method for testing SAC. The findings suggest that serological assays may offer a more accurate and practical alternative for antemortem detection of camelid TB.
南美洲骆驼科动物(SAC)的结核病(TB)由牛分枝杆菌或微小分枝杆菌引起。使用自然感染的SAC对两种血清学方法——快速检测(RT)和双路径平台(DPP)检测进行了评估。研究群体包括英国、瑞士和美国的156只羊驼和175只美洲驼。通过大体病理学检查和培养诊断出35只羊驼和17只美洲驼患有牛分枝杆菌(n = 44)或微小分枝杆菌(n = 8)引起的结核病。对照动物来自无结核病病史的畜群。RT和DPP检测对羊驼的敏感性分别为71%和74%,而两种检测对美洲驼的敏感性均为77%。对于美洲驼,DPP检测的特异性(98%)高于RT(94%);对于羊驼,两种检测的特异性相同(98%)。当将两种抗体检测结合使用时,平行检测解读(当任一检测产生阳性结果时应用)将抗体检测的敏感性提高到羊驼为89%,美洲驼为88%,但代价是特异性降低(分别为97%和93%),而系列检测解读(当两种检测均产生阳性结果时应用)将两种SAC物种的特异性最大化至100%,尽管羊驼的敏感性为57%,美洲驼的敏感性为65%。超过95%有结核病证据的动物未能产生皮肤试验反应,从而证实了对该方法用于检测SAC有效性的担忧。研究结果表明,血清学检测可能为骆驼科动物结核病的生前检测提供一种更准确、实用的替代方法。