McGill University.
J Couns Psychol. 2008 Oct;55(4):495-504. doi: 10.1037/a0013721.
This study explored J. Bowlby's (1988) secure-base hypothesis, which predicts that a client's secure attachment to the therapist, as well as the client's and the therapist's global attachment security, will facilitate in-session exploration. Volunteer clients (N = 59) and trainee counselors (N = 59) in short-term therapy completed the Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (K. A. Brennan, C. L. Clark, & P. R. Shaver, 1998) as a measure of adult global romantic and peer attachment orientations; the Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (B. Mallinckrodt, D. L. Gantt, & H. M. Coble, 1995) as a measure of attachment to counselor; the Working Alliance Inventory (A. O. Horvath & L. Greenberg, 1989) as a measure of working alliance; and the Session Evaluation Questionnaire-Depth Subscale (W. B. Stiles & J. S. Snow, 1984) as a measure of session depth. In line with Bowlby's hypothesis, the findings suggest that session depth is related to the client's experience of attachment security with the counselor and that counselor global attachment moderates the relationship between client global attachment and session exploration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究探讨了 J. Bowlby（1988）的安全基地假设，该假设预测，来访者对治疗师的安全依恋，以及来访者和治疗师的整体依恋安全性，将促进治疗中的探索。短期治疗中的志愿者来访者（N=59）和实习咨询师（N=59）完成了亲密关系经历量表（K. A. Brennan、C. L. Clark 和 P. R. Shaver，1998），作为成人整体浪漫和同伴依恋取向的衡量标准；来访者对治疗师的依恋量表（B. Mallinckrodt、D. L. Gantt 和 H. M. Coble，1995），作为对咨询师的依恋的衡量标准；工作联盟量表（A. O. Horvath 和 L. Greenberg，1989），作为工作联盟的衡量标准；以及会谈评估问卷-深度子量表（W. B. Stiles 和 J. S. Snow，1984），作为会谈深度的衡量标准。与 Bowlby 的假设一致，研究结果表明，会谈深度与来访者对咨询师的依恋安全性体验有关，而咨询师的整体依恋则调节了来访者的整体依恋与会谈探索之间的关系。（APA，2010，所有权利保留）。
