Babshet Medha, Acharya Ashith B, Naikmasur Venkatesh G
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental Collage & Hospital, Vidyanagar, Hassan, Karnataka, India.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2011 Nov;18(8):350-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Pulp/tooth area ratio (PTR) method of adult dental age estimation has been examined on few tooth types. We assessed the lateral incisor (LI) and first premolar (PM1) in addition to canine (C) - alone and in combination. Periapical radiographs from 61 Indians aged 21-71 years were examined. PTR of LI produced the best age correlation (r = -0.395) followed closely by PM1 (r = -0.362). The canine revealed the lowest correlation (r = -0.206); among tooth combinations, the three teeth taken together had the best R value (-0.438) followed by LI + PM1 (-0.435), LI + C (-0.406) and C + PM1 (-0.37). The standard errors of estimates (S.E.E.) of the regression analyses for the individual teeth and tooth combinations ranged from ±12.13 to 13.08 years, indicating minimal difference in age estimates using solitary or multiple teeth. Errors were higher than in European groups (±2.5-5 years) which may partly owe to moderate age correlation of secondary dentine deposition in Indians. Moreover, facial soft-tissue superimposition in living subjects evaluated herein possibly precluded optimal tooth and pulp canal visualization. These indicate that the PTR method should be used judiciously in age estimation of living Indian adults, although further studies on larger samples with evenly distributed age-groups is necessary for deriving definitive conclusions.
成人牙龄估计的牙髓/牙面积比(PTR)方法仅在少数几种牙齿类型上进行过研究。我们除了单独评估犬齿(C)外,还评估了侧切牙(LI)和第一前磨牙(PM1),并将它们组合起来评估。对61名年龄在21至71岁的印度人的根尖片进行了检查。LI的PTR产生了最佳的年龄相关性(r = -0.395),紧随其后的是PM1(r = -0.362)。犬齿的相关性最低(r = -0.206);在牙齿组合中,三颗牙齿一起评估的R值最佳(-0.438),其次是LI + PM1(-0.435)、LI + C(-0.406)和C + PM1(-0.37)。对单个牙齿和牙齿组合进行回归分析的估计标准误差(S.E.E.)在±12.13至13.08岁之间,这表明使用单颗牙齿或多颗牙齿进行年龄估计的差异最小。误差高于欧洲人群(±2.5 - 5岁),这可能部分归因于印度人继发性牙本质沉积的年龄相关性中等。此外,本文评估的活体受试者面部软组织重叠可能妨碍了对牙齿和牙髓腔的最佳可视化。这些表明,尽管需要对年龄组分布均匀的更大样本进行进一步研究以得出明确结论,但在估计印度成年活体的年龄时应谨慎使用PTR方法。