Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Dec;50(12):2270-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker270. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
To give an overview of the recommendations for the use of anti-TNF-α therapy in AS in 23 countries worldwide.
The recommendations were collected, translated and a summary was checked by Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) members from the respective countries. The recommendations were compared with the ASAS recommendations (2006) on three aspects: patient selection for initiation of treatment (diagnosis, disease activity, previous treatment and contraindications), assessment of disease and assessment of response.
The majority of the recommendations are similar to the ASAS recommendation with regard to patient selection, assessment of disease and treatment response. Additional objective assessments of disease activity are required in eight countries, leading to a more strict indication to start anti-TNF-α therapy. CONCLUSION; Most national recommendations follow the international ASAS recommendations, suggesting that the latter are widely implemented. This might contribute to comparable access with anti-TNF-α treatment across countries. This article shows that general consensus exists about the use of anti-TNF-α therapy in AS across the world, although some countries require additional objective signs of inflammation and/or more pre-treatment, which limits access.
对全球 23 个国家/地区在 AS 中使用抗 TNF-α 治疗的建议进行概述。
从各个国家/地区的 ASAS 成员处收集、翻译建议,并对摘要进行检查。将建议与 ASAS 建议(2006 年)在三个方面进行比较:治疗开始时的患者选择(诊断、疾病活动度、既往治疗和禁忌症)、疾病评估和反应评估。
大多数建议在患者选择、疾病评估和治疗反应方面与 ASAS 建议相似。在八个国家/地区需要对疾病活动度进行额外的客观评估,从而更严格地确定开始使用抗 TNF-α 治疗的适应证。
大多数国家/地区的建议都遵循国际 ASAS 建议,表明后者得到了广泛的实施。这可能有助于在各国之间获得可比的抗 TNF-α 治疗机会。本文表明,尽管一些国家/地区需要额外的炎症客观指标和/或更多的治疗前准备,但全球范围内对抗 TNF-α 治疗 AS 的使用存在普遍共识,限制了其应用。