• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《罗伦兹残疾评定问卷韩文版的心理计量学特征》。

Psychometric characteristics of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Oct;26(10):1364-70. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1364. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1364
PMID:22022191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3192350/
Abstract

The aims of this study were; 1) to develop the final version of the Korean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and 2) to compare the responsiveness between the RDQ and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores in patients having low back pain. The psychometric properties of the final Korean RDQ were evaluated in 221 patients. Among them, 30 patients were reliability tested. Validity was evaluated using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Korean ODI. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the RDQ and the ODI was compared in 54 patients with lumbar zygapophyseal (facet) joint pain. There was a moderate relationship between the RDQ and NRS (r = 0.59, P < 0.01) and a strongly positive correlation between the RDQ and the ODI (r = 0.76, P < 0.001). The Korean RDQ with the higher area under the ROC curve showed a better overall responsive performance than did the ODI in patients with lumbar facet joint pain after medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (P < 0.01). The results of the study present the final version of the Korean RDQ is valid for assessing functional status in a Korean population with chronic low back pain.

摘要

本研究的目的是

1)制定韩国 Roland-Morris 残疾问卷(RDQ)的最终版本,2)比较 RDQ 和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)在腰痛患者中的反应性。对 221 例患者进行了最终韩国 RDQ 的心理测量学特性评估。其中,30 例患者进行了可靠性测试。使用 11 点数字评分量表(NRS)和韩国 ODI 评估有效性。在 54 例腰椎关节突关节(小面)关节痛患者中比较了 RDQ 和 ODI 的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。RDQ 与 NRS 之间存在中度关系(r = 0.59,P < 0.01),RDQ 与 ODI 之间存在强正相关(r = 0.76,P < 0.001)。在接受内侧支射频神经切断术治疗后,ROC 曲线下面积较高的韩国 RDQ 在腰椎小面关节痛患者中的整体反应性能优于 ODI(P < 0.01)。研究结果表明,最终版韩国 RDQ 可有效评估韩国慢性腰痛患者的功能状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/3192350/0b7f951ca29e/jkms-26-1364-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/3192350/eb6efddf9618/jkms-26-1364-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/3192350/0b7f951ca29e/jkms-26-1364-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/3192350/eb6efddf9618/jkms-26-1364-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/3192350/0b7f951ca29e/jkms-26-1364-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric characteristics of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.《罗伦兹残疾评定问卷韩文版的心理计量学特征》。
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Oct;26(10):1364-70. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1364. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
2
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.奥斯威斯瑞残疾指数、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷及魁北克背痛残疾量表:伊朗版本的翻译与验证研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
3
Validity and reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a) in Indian population.英文和马拉地文 Oswestry 残疾指数(版本 2.1a)在印度人群中的有效性和可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):E662-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828a34c3.
4
Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a.古吉拉特语版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数2.1a的信度和效度研究
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Sep 22;30(5):1103-1109. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169728.
5
Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷日语版的验证
J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(4):543-8. doi: 10.1007/s00776-003-0679-x.
6
Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.奥斯威斯利残疾指数德文版的开发。第1部分:跨文化调适、信度和效度。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0815-0. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
7
The Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version.奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(2.1a版):荷兰语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):E83-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000683.
8
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
9
[Validation and cultural adaptation of the Chilean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire].[罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷智利版本的验证与文化调适]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jun;142(6):716-22. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000600005.
10
Development of a French-Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.《Oswestry 残疾指数的法加版本开发:跨文化调适与验证》。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 1;37(7):E439-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318233eaf9.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the inaugural Albanian Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Albanian population with low back pain.阿尔巴尼亚罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷在阿尔巴尼亚腰痛人群中的翻译、跨文化调适、效度与信度研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0325777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325777. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprasion of Effectiveness of CT vs C-arm Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Lumbar Facet Rhizotomy.CT 与 C 臂引导经皮射频腰椎小关节突脊神经射频消融术的疗效比较。
Korean J Pain. 2010 Jun;23(2):137-41. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2010.23.2.137. Epub 2010 May 31.
2
What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire?哪些因素会影响 Roland-Morris 残疾问卷的测量特性?
Eur J Pain. 2010 Feb;14(2):200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 May 13.
3
Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
与Oswestry功能障碍指数v2.1以及罗兰-莫里斯功能障碍问卷相比,一种针对患者的特定结局指标对亚急性和慢性下腰痛患者的反应性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818916fd.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷阿根廷版本的跨文化适应与验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1391-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318173dc8f.
5
Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints--targeting the best practice.腰椎小关节射频去神经术——寻求最佳实践
Pain Med. 2008 Mar;9(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00345.x.
6
Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Moroccan version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷摩洛哥版本的翻译、改编及验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):1461-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a63d.
7
Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness.背痛研究中外部标准的选择:这重要吗?基于反应性分析的建议
Pain. 2007 Sep;131(1-2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.023. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
8
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.针对健康状况调查问卷的测量属性提出了质量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
9
Polish cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire for evaluation of quality of life in patients with low back pain.罗兰-莫里斯问卷的波兰文化适应性,用于评估腰痛患者的生活质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2744-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244632.76447.62.
10
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.奥斯威斯瑞残疾指数、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷及魁北克背痛残疾量表:伊朗版本的翻译与验证研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.