Department of Psychology, National Chengchi University.
Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;137(6):1029-64. doi: 10.1037/a0025410.
A meta-analysis examined the extent to which socio-structural and psycho-cultural characteristics of societies correspond with how much gender and ethnic/racial groups differ on their support of group-based hierarchy. Robustly, women opposed group-based hierarchy more than men did, and members of lower power ethnic/racial groups opposed group-based hierarchy more than members of higher power ethnic/racial groups did. As predicted by social dominance theory, gender differences were larger, more stable, and less variable from sample to sample than differences between ethnic/racial groups. Subordinate gender and ethnic/racial group members disagreed more with dominants in their views of group-based hierarchy in societies that can be considered more liberal and modern (e.g., emphasizing individualism and change from traditions), as well as in societies that enjoyed greater gender equality. The relations between gender and ethnic/racial groups are discussed, and implications are developed for social dominance theory, social role theory, biosocial theory, social identity theory, system justification theory, realistic group conflict theory, and relative deprivation theory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).
一项元分析考察了社会的社会结构和心理文化特征在多大程度上与性别和族裔/种族群体在支持群体等级制度方面的差异程度相对应。强有力的证据表明,女性比男性更反对基于群体的等级制度,权力较低的族裔/种族群体的成员比权力较高的族裔/种族群体的成员更反对基于群体的等级制度。正如社会支配理论所预测的那样,性别差异比族裔/种族群体之间的差异更大、更稳定、更具可变性,且在不同样本之间的差异更小。在被认为更加自由和现代化的社会中(例如,强调个人主义和传统的变革),以及在性别平等程度较高的社会中,处于从属地位的性别和族裔/种族群体成员在群体等级制度方面与支配群体的观点存在更大的分歧。本文讨论了性别和族裔/种族群体之间的关系,并为社会支配理论、社会角色理论、生物社会理论、社会认同理论、制度正当化理论、现实群体冲突理论和相对剥夺理论的发展提供了启示。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2011 APA,保留所有权利)。