Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Front Zool. 2011 Oct 26;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-25.
Taxonomy or biological systematics is the basic scientific discipline of biology, postulating hypotheses of identity and relationships, on which all other natural sciences dealing with organisms relies. However, the scientific contributions of taxonomists have been largely neglected when using species names in scientific publications by not citing the authority on which they are based.
Consequences of this neglect is reduced recognition of the importance of taxonomy, which in turn results in diminished funding, lower interest from journals in publishing taxonomic research, and a reduced number of young scientists entering the field. This has lead to the so-called taxonomic impediment at a time when biodiversity studies are of critical importance.Here we emphasize a practical and obvious solution to this dilemma. We propose that whenever a species name is used, the author(s) of the species hypothesis be included and the original literature source cited, including taxonomic revisions and identification literature - nothing more than what is done for every other hypothesis or assumption included in a scientific publication. In addition, we postulate that journals primarily publishing taxonomic studies should be indexed in ISISM.
The proposal outlined above would make visible the true contribution of taxonomists within the scientific community, and would provide a more accurate assessment for funding agencies impact and importance of taxonomy, and help in the recruitment of young scientists into the field, thus helping to alleviate the taxonomic impediment. In addition, it would also make much of the biological literature more robust by reducing or alleviating taxonomic uncertainty.
分类学或生物系统学是生物学的基础科学学科,它假设了同一性和关系的假说,所有其他涉及生物体的自然科学都依赖于这些假说。然而,在科学出版物中使用物种名称时,分类学家的科学贡献在很大程度上被忽视了,没有引用他们所依据的权威。
这种忽视的后果是降低了对分类学重要性的认识,这反过来又导致资金减少、期刊对分类学研究的兴趣降低,以及进入该领域的年轻科学家人数减少。这导致了所谓的分类学障碍,而此时生物多样性研究至关重要。在这里,我们强调了一个解决这一困境的实际而明显的解决方案。我们建议,每当使用物种名称时,作者应包括物种假说的作者,并引用原始文献来源,包括分类修订和鉴定文献——这比在科学出版物中包含的任何其他假设或假设都要多。此外,我们假设主要发表分类学研究的期刊应在 ISISM 中进行索引。
上述建议将使分类学家在科学界的真正贡献变得可见,并为资助机构提供更准确的评估,评估分类学的影响和重要性,并有助于招募年轻科学家进入该领域,从而有助于缓解分类学障碍。此外,它还可以通过减少或缓解分类学不确定性,使更多的生物文献更加可靠。