• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分类法的障碍与分类法使用者:可及性与影响评估

Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: accessibility and impact evaluation.

作者信息

Ebach Malte C, Valdecasas Antonio G, Wheeler Quentin D

机构信息

Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052 NSW, Australia.

Museo Nacional Ciencias Naturales, c/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Cladistics. 2011 Oct;27(5):550-557. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00348.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00348.x
PMID:34875802
Abstract

There has been much discussion of the "taxonomic impediment". This phrase confuses two kinds of impediment: an impediment to end users imposed by lack of reliable information; and impediments to taxonomy itself, which vary from insufficient funding to low citation rates of taxonomic monographs. In order to resolve both these types of impediment, taxonomy needs to be revitalized through funding and training taxonomists, as well as investing in taxonomic revisions and monographs rather than technological surrogates such as DNA barcoding. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.

摘要

关于“分类学障碍”已经有很多讨论。这个短语混淆了两种障碍:一种是由于缺乏可靠信息给最终用户带来的障碍;另一种是分类学自身的障碍,包括资金不足到分类学专著引用率低等各种情况。为了解决这两种类型的障碍,分类学需要通过资助和培训分类学家来振兴,同时投资于分类学修订和专著,而不是像DNA条形码这样的技术替代物。© 威利·亨尼希协会2011年。

相似文献

1
Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: accessibility and impact evaluation.分类法的障碍与分类法使用者:可及性与影响评估
Cladistics. 2011 Oct;27(5):550-557. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00348.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
2
A Falsification of the Citation Impediment in the Taxonomic Literature.分类学文献中引用障碍的一种证伪。
Syst Biol. 2015 Sep;64(5):860-8. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv026. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Plant Taxonomy: A Historical Perspective, Current Challenges, and Perspectives.植物分类学:历史视角、当前挑战与展望
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2222:1-38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_1.
4
After 7 years and 1000 citations: comparative assessment of the DNA barcoding and the DNA taxonomy proposals for taxonomists and non-taxonomists.7年1000次引用之后:针对分类学家和非分类学家的DNA条形码与DNA分类法提议的比较评估
Mitochondrial DNA. 2010 Dec;21(6):206-26. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2010.532212.
5
Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny.分类学筛选与系统发育的局限性
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):571-83. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1452.
6
The taxonomist - an endangered race. A practical proposal for its survival.分类学家——一个濒危的种族。关于其生存的实用建议。
Front Zool. 2011 Oct 26;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-25.
7
Plant taxonomy: a historical perspective, current challenges, and perspectives.植物分类学:历史视角、当前挑战与展望。
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1115:1-37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_1.
8
Phenotypic vs genotypic approaches to biodiversity, from conflict to alliance.生物多样性的表型与基因型研究方法:从冲突到联盟
Mar Genomics. 2014 Oct;17:63-4. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
Sizing the Knowledge Gap in Taxonomy: The Last Dozen Years of Aphidiinae Research.评估分类学中的知识差距:蚜茧蜂亚科研究的过去十二年
Insects. 2022 Feb 5;13(2):170. doi: 10.3390/insects13020170.
10
Algal taxonomy: a road to nowhere?藻类分类学:一条没有出路的道路?
J Phycol. 2013 Apr;49(2):215-25. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12020. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Protecting hidden treasures: Indigenous lands safeguard 50% of areas with the highest potential for angiosperm discoveries in Brazil-patterns and conservation priorities.保护隐秘宝藏:巴西本土土地保护了50%被子植物发现潜力最高的区域——模式与保护重点
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0326507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326507. eCollection 2025.
2
AI-based coral species discrimination: A case study of the Siderastrea Atlantic Complex.基于人工智能的珊瑚物种鉴别:以大西洋星珊瑚复合体为例
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 11;19(12):e0312494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312494. eCollection 2024.
3
Clavis: An open and versatile identification key format.
clave:一种开放且通用的鉴定关键格式。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277752. eCollection 2022.
4
Diatoms.org: supporting taxonomists, connecting communities.硅藻.org:支持分类学家,连接各群体。
Diatom Res. 2022 Jan 11;36(4):291-304. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2021.2006790.
5
Publication practice in Taxonomy: Global inequalities and potential bias against negative results.分类学中的出版实践:全球不平等和对负面结果的潜在偏见。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0269246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269246. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of Culturing and Metabarcoding Methods to Describe the Fungal Endophytic Assemblage of Growing in a Range of Anthropized Disturbance Regimes.培养法与代谢条形码技术用于描述生长在一系列人为干扰环境中的真菌内生菌群落的比较
Biology (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;10(12):1246. doi: 10.3390/biology10121246.
7
Preliminary placement and new records of an overlooked Amazonian tree, (Malvaceae).一种被忽视的亚马逊树木(锦葵科)的初步定位与新记录
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 15;9:e12244. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12244. eCollection 2021.
8
Global gap-analysis of amphipod barcode library.全球端足目条形码文库差距分析。
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 4;9:e12352. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12352. eCollection 2021.
9
The patterns of vascular plant discoveries in China.中国维管植物的发现模式。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 24;11(18):12378-12388. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7971. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Are publications on zoological taxonomy under attack?动物分类学方面的出版物正受到攻击吗?
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 10;8(2):201617. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201617.