• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生部门对处理健康科学不确定性的看法。

The Department of Health perspective on handling uncertainties in health sciences.

机构信息

Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NS, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Dec 13;369(1956):4853-63. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0123.

DOI:10.1098/rsta.2011.0123
PMID:22042901
Abstract

Recognizing and working with uncertainty in handling risk are part of both clinical practice and the policy-making process. The Department of Health recognizes the inherent challenges that uncertainty brings and employs a wide range of research mechanisms, drawing on a diverse set of disciplines, to provide an evidence base to inform both policy creation and implementation, and clinical practice. This paper describes a variety of situations and the Government response to them, each time highlighting the use of science to reduce unknowns and to support decision-making. It highlights the need for a strong research infrastructure to support the Department's requirements, and those of the NHS, both in real time to respond to emergencies and to establish a high standard of care. However, although science provides a powerful tool to reduce uncertainty, it will not always produce definitive answers and often provides the start point for a dialogue between decision makers and researchers.

摘要

认识和处理风险中的不确定性是临床实践和决策过程的一部分。卫生部认识到不确定性带来的固有挑战,并采用了广泛的研究机制,借鉴了多个学科,为政策制定和实施以及临床实践提供了证据基础。本文描述了各种情况和政府的应对措施,每次都强调了利用科学来减少未知因素并支持决策。它强调了需要一个强大的研究基础设施来支持卫生部的需求,以及国民保健制度的需求,既要实时应对紧急情况,又要建立高标准的护理水平。然而,尽管科学提供了一个强大的工具来减少不确定性,但它并不总是能给出明确的答案,而且往往为决策者和研究人员之间的对话提供了起点。

相似文献

1
The Department of Health perspective on handling uncertainties in health sciences.卫生部门对处理健康科学不确定性的看法。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Dec 13;369(1956):4853-63. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0123.
2
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.认识医疗保健政策分析中的修辞手法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Jan;13(1):40-6. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029.
3
The impact of social science research on health policy.社会科学研究对卫生政策的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Nov;39(9):1287-93. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90360-3.
4
Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.新生儿比较疗效试验中的伦理陷阱。
Neonatology. 2014;105(4):350-1. doi: 10.1159/000360650. Epub 2014 May 30.
5
Pharmacogenetics and uncertainty: implications for policy makers.药物遗传学与不确定性:对政策制定者的影响
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2006 Sep;37(3):533-49. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
6
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.实用临床试验:提高临床研究在临床和卫生政策决策中的价值。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.
7
Uncertainty in macroeconomic policy-making: art or science?宏观经济决策中的不确定性:艺术还是科学?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Dec 13;369(1956):4798-817. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0299.
8
Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.经济评估中的敏感性分析:对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所当前实践的审核及其在决策中的应用与价值综述
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. doi: 10.3310/hta13290.
9
Challenges in getting workforce research in nursing used for decision-making in policy and practice: a Canadian perspective.将护理领域的劳动力研究应用于政策和实践决策中的挑战:加拿大视角
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(24):3338-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02641.x.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Biases in AI: acknowledging and addressing the inevitable ethical issues.人工智能中的偏见:认识并解决不可避免的伦理问题。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 20;7:1614105. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1614105. eCollection 2025.
2
Public health and expert failure.公共卫生与专家失误。
Public Choice. 2023;195(1-2):101-124. doi: 10.1007/s11127-021-00928-4. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
An expression of uncertainty and its application to positioning: a quality-metric and optimal ranges for the identification of cells with RFID.不确定性的一种表达及其在定位中的应用:一种用于通过射频识别(RFID)识别细胞的质量指标和最佳范围。
Springerplus. 2015 Jul 24;4:374. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1084-6. eCollection 2015.