• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能中的偏见:认识并解决不可避免的伦理问题。

Biases in AI: acknowledging and addressing the inevitable ethical issues.

作者信息

Hofmann Bjørn

机构信息

Centre of Medical Ethics, The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Institute of the Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 20;7:1614105. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1614105. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1614105
PMID:40909204
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12405166/
Abstract

Biases in artificial intelligence (AI) systems pose a range of ethical issues. The myriads of biases in AI systems are briefly reviewed and divided in three main categories: input bias, system bias, and application bias. These biases pose a series of basic ethical challenges: injustice, bad output/outcome, loss of autonomy, transformation of basic concepts and values, and erosion of accountability. A review of the many ways to identify, measure, and mitigate these biases reveals commendable efforts to avoid or reduce bias; however, it also highlights the persistence of unresolved biases. Residual and undetected biases present epistemic challenges with substantial ethical implications. The article further investigates whether the general principles, checklists, guidelines, frameworks, or regulations of AI ethics could address the identified ethical issues with bias. Unfortunately, the depth and diversity of these challenges often exceed the capabilities of existing approaches. Consequently, the article suggests that we must acknowledge and accept some residual ethical issues related to biases in AI systems. By utilizing insights from ethics and moral psychology, we can better navigate this landscape. To maximize the benefits and minimize the harms of biases in AI, it is imperative to identify and mitigate existing biases and remain transparent about the consequences of those we cannot eliminate. This necessitates close collaboration between scientists and ethicists.

摘要

人工智能(AI)系统中的偏差引发了一系列伦理问题。本文简要回顾了AI系统中大量的偏差,并将其分为三大类:输入偏差、系统偏差和应用偏差。这些偏差带来了一系列基本的伦理挑战:不公正、不良输出/结果、自主性丧失、基本概念和价值观的转变以及问责制的削弱。对识别、衡量和减轻这些偏差的多种方法进行的回顾揭示了为避免或减少偏差所做出的值得称赞的努力;然而,这也凸显了未解决偏差的持续性。残留和未被检测到的偏差带来了具有重大伦理意义的认知挑战。本文进一步探讨了AI伦理的一般原则、清单、指南、框架或法规是否能够解决已识别的偏差伦理问题。不幸的是,这些挑战的深度和多样性往往超出了现有方法的能力范围。因此,本文建议我们必须承认并接受与AI系统中的偏差相关的一些残留伦理问题。通过借鉴伦理学和道德心理学的见解,我们可以更好地应对这一局面。为了最大限度地提高AI偏差的益处并最小化其危害,必须识别并减轻现有的偏差,并对那些无法消除的偏差的后果保持透明。这需要科学家和伦理学家之间的密切合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/9f8bf5fd0c06/fdgth-07-1614105-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/ac7b9e08b47d/fdgth-07-1614105-ga001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/6b1453303dd6/fdgth-07-1614105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/a2a96c0d4084/fdgth-07-1614105-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/f0dc4cd34038/fdgth-07-1614105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/9f8bf5fd0c06/fdgth-07-1614105-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/ac7b9e08b47d/fdgth-07-1614105-ga001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/6b1453303dd6/fdgth-07-1614105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/a2a96c0d4084/fdgth-07-1614105-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/f0dc4cd34038/fdgth-07-1614105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88d2/12405166/9f8bf5fd0c06/fdgth-07-1614105-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Biases in AI: acknowledging and addressing the inevitable ethical issues.人工智能中的偏见:认识并解决不可避免的伦理问题。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 20;7:1614105. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1614105. eCollection 2025.
2
Does an App a Day Keep the Doctor Away? AI Symptom Checker Applications, Entrenched Bias, and Professional Responsibility.一天一个 App ,能否让医生远离我?人工智能症状检查应用程序、根深蒂固的偏见与专业责任。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 5;26:e50344. doi: 10.2196/50344.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Enhancing education for children with ASD: a review of evaluation and measurement in AI tool implementation.加强自闭症谱系障碍儿童的教育:人工智能工具实施中的评估与测量综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Mar 13:1-18. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2477678.
5
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
6
From black box to clarity: Strategies for effective AI informed consent in healthcare.从黑箱到明晰:医疗保健中有效人工智能知情同意的策略。
Artif Intell Med. 2025 May 24;167:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103169.
7
High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare.高回报、高风险技术?医疗保健领域人工智能开发的伦理与法律剖析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01158-1.
8
Ethical considerations for artificial intelligence in dermatology: a scoping review.人工智能在皮肤科应用的伦理考量:范围综述。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 May 17;190(6):789-797. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae040.
9
Community engagement for artificial intelligence health research in Africa.非洲人工智能健康研究的社区参与。
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Mar 20;10:158. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23684.1. eCollection 2025.
10
Bridging Health Disparities in the Data-Driven World of Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review.在数据驱动的人工智能世界中弥合健康差距:一项叙述性综述
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02057-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Socially assistive robots and meaningful work: the case of aged care.社交辅助机器人与有意义的工作:老年护理案例
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1070. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05498-0. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
What makes clinical machine learning fair? A practical ethics framework.什么使临床机器学习公平?一个实用的伦理框架。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Mar 18;4(3):e0000728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000728. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications.人工智能医疗应用中的偏差识别与缓解策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 11;8(1):154. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01503-7.
4
Bias Mitigation in Primary Health Care Artificial Intelligence Models: Scoping Review.初级卫生保健人工智能模型中的偏差缓解:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 7;27:e60269. doi: 10.2196/60269.
5
Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning.人工智能/机器学习中的伦理与偏见考量
Mod Pathol. 2025 Mar;38(3):100686. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
6
Artificial intelligence - the emperor's new clothes?人工智能——皇帝的新衣?
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 27;10:20552076241287370. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287370. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing.探索人工智能和靶向药物制造中的偏见风险。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01112-1.
8
"My Biomarkers Are Fine, Thank You": On the Biomarkerization of Modern Medicine.“我的生物标志物没问题,谢谢”:论现代医学的生物标志物化
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):453-457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09019-8. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Addressing AI Algorithmic Bias in Health Care.解决医疗保健中的人工智能算法偏见问题。
JAMA. 2024 Oct 1;332(13):1051-1052. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13486.
10
The ethics of ChatGPT in medicine and healthcare: a systematic review on Large Language Models (LLMs).ChatGPT在医学与医疗保健领域的伦理问题:关于大语言模型(LLMs)的系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 8;7(1):183. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01157-x.