• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要机械通气的患者转至长期护理院的简化评分。

A simplified score for transfer of patients requiring mechanical ventilation to a long-term care hospital.

机构信息

Center for Urban Population Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2011 Nov;20(6):e122-30. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011775.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2011775
PMID:22045148
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term care hospitals are Medicare providers of postacute care that have a mean length of stay of 25 days or more. Early identification and timely transfer of patients requiring mechanical ventilation to such hospitals may improve the efficiency of inpatient care.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a predictive model and a simplified score for use on day 7 of hospitalization to assess whether a patient receiving mechanical ventilation is likely to require an additional 25 days of hospitalization (ie, would qualify for transfer to a long-term care hospital).

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study using hospital discharge and billing data from the 2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 54 686 Medicare beneficiaries admitted to US community hospitals who met the study's eligibility criteria. The outcome was overall length of stay (≥32 vs <32 days). Split-sample validation was used. Multivariable survey-logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors and probability of the outcome. A simplified score was derived from the final predictive model.

RESULTS

The discriminatory power of the predictive model was 0.75 and that of the simplified score was 0.72. The model calibrated well. All predictors were significantly (P < .01) associated with a hospitalization of 32 days or longer; having a tracheostomy was the strongest predictor (odds ratio, 4.74). The simplified scores ranged from -5 to 110 points and were categorized into 3 classes of risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to aid discharge decision making and optimize hospital resource planning could take advantage of our predictive model and the simplified scoring tool.

摘要

背景

长期护理医院是医疗保险提供的急性后期护理机构,患者平均住院时间为 25 天或以上。早期识别和及时将需要机械通气的患者转移到这类医院,可能会提高住院护理的效率。

目的

开发一种预测模型和简化评分,用于患者住院第 7 天,评估接受机械通气的患者是否需要再住院 25 天(即符合转入长期护理医院的条件)。

方法

采用回顾性、横断面研究,使用 2005 年全国住院患者样本中的住院和计费数据,纳入符合研究条件的 54686 名接受机械通气的 Medicare 受益人的美国社区医院住院患者。结局为总住院时间(≥32 天与<32 天)。采用样本拆分验证。采用多变量调查逻辑回归分析评估预测因素和结局的可能性。从最终预测模型中得出简化评分。

结果

预测模型的判别能力为 0.75,简化评分的判别能力为 0.72。模型校准良好。所有预测因素与住院 32 天或以上均显著相关(P<.01);气管造口术是最强的预测因素(比值比,4.74)。简化评分范围为-5 至 110 分,分为 3 个风险等级。

结论

为了帮助做出出院决策和优化医院资源规划,可以利用我们的预测模型和简化评分工具。

相似文献

1
A simplified score for transfer of patients requiring mechanical ventilation to a long-term care hospital.需要机械通气的患者转至长期护理院的简化评分。
Am J Crit Care. 2011 Nov;20(6):e122-30. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011775.
2
Is tracheostomy associated with better outcomes for patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation?气管切开术对于需要长期机械通气的患者而言,是否能带来更好的治疗结果?
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):802-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000256721.60517.B1.
3
Do age and gender influence outcome from mechanical ventilation?年龄和性别会影响机械通气的结果吗?
Heart Lung. 1993 Sep-Oct;22(5):442-9.
4
Predicting discharge to a long-term acute care hospital after admission to an intensive care unit.预测重症监护病房入院后转至长期急性护理医院的情况。
Am J Crit Care. 2014 Jul;23(4):e46-53. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014985.
5
Development and validation of a model that uses enhanced administrative data to predict mortality in patients with sepsis.开发和验证一种使用增强型行政数据预测脓毒症患者死亡率的模型。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2425-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822572e3.
6
Complicated acute myocardial infarction requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: prognostic factors of clinical outcome in a series of 157 patients.重症监护病房中需要机械通气的复杂急性心肌梗死:157例患者临床结局的预后因素
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):100-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098605.58349.76.
7
Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.1993年至2003年,澳大利亚和新西兰成人重症监护患者双边数据库中的死亡率和住院时间结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):46-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.
8
Morbidity, mortality, and quality-of-life outcomes of patients requiring >or=14 days of mechanical ventilation.需要机械通气≥14天的患者的发病率、死亡率及生活质量结果
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1373-81. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065188.87029.C3.
9
Cirrhotic patients in the medical intensive care unit: early prognosis and long-term survival.肝硬化患者在重症监护病房:早期预后和长期生存。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2108-16. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f3dea9.
10
Prediction of long-term ventilatory support in trauma patients.创伤患者长期通气支持的预测
Am Surg. 1996 Jan;62(1):19-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Respiratory Intensive Care Experiences and Relationships with Nutritional Status Among Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房患者呼吸重症监护经历及其与营养状况关系的评估
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 19;61(2):356. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020356.
2
Time spent in prior hospital stay and outcomes for ventilator patients in long-term acute care hospitals.长期急性护理医院中使用呼吸机患者的先前住院时间和结果。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01454-1.