• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《癌症量表的影响》第一版:在癌症幸存者的异质样本中对挪威语翻译进行心理计量学测试。

"The impact of cancer scale" version 1: psychometric testing of the Norwegian translation in a heterogeneous sample of cancer survivors.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Postboks 4953, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1459-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0053-y. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-0053-y
PMID:22045155
Abstract

PURPOSE

The impact of cancer scale version 1 (IOC-1) from 2006 has only been tested psychometrically in a heterogeneous sample of 193 American long-term cancer survivors (LTSs). The Norwegian version of IOC-1 compares the psychometric findings of that study with those observed in a heterogeneous sample of 809 Norwegian LTSs.

METHODS

We performed exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses, tests of internal consistency, correlational studies with various other tests and a change over time examination in order to test reliability and validity of the IOC-1.

RESULTS

The American factor structure of the IOC-1 with 10 dimensions showed adequate fit with CFA in the Norwegian sample, but internal consistency was insufficient in 2 dimensions. EFA of the Norwegian sample found a 9 factor solution that also showed adequate fit on CFA, and with sufficient internal consistencies for all dimensions. The SF-36 dimensions, anxiety, depression, neuroticism, fatigue and body image all showed low correlations with the positive dimensions of the IOC-1, but higher correlations with the IOC-1 negative dimensions. The IOC-1 dimensions showed considerable stability over time.

CONCLUSIONS

In our big heterogeneous sample of LTSs, the Norwegian version of the IOC-1 showed discriminant and concurrent validity, and reliability was supported.

摘要

目的

2006 年版癌症量表 1(IOC-1)仅在 193 名美国长期癌症幸存者(LTS)的异质样本中进行了心理测量学测试。IOC-1 的挪威版本将该研究的心理测量学发现与在 809 名挪威 LTS 的异质样本中观察到的结果进行了比较。

方法

我们进行了探索性(EFA)和验证性(CFA)因子分析、内部一致性测试、与各种其他测试的相关性研究以及随时间的变化检查,以测试 IOC-1 的可靠性和有效性。

结果

IOC-1 的美国 10 维度因子结构在挪威样本中具有足够的 CFA 拟合度,但在 2 个维度上内部一致性不足。挪威样本的 EFA 发现了 9 个因素的解决方案,在 CFA 上也具有足够的拟合度,并且所有维度的内部一致性都足够。SF-36 维度、焦虑、抑郁、神经质、疲劳和身体形象与 IOC-1 的积极维度相关性较低,但与 IOC-1 的消极维度相关性较高。IOC-1 维度在相当长的时间内表现出相当大的稳定性。

结论

在我们的大型 LTS 异质样本中,IOC-1 的挪威版本表现出了区分性和同时有效性,可靠性得到了支持。

相似文献

1
"The impact of cancer scale" version 1: psychometric testing of the Norwegian translation in a heterogeneous sample of cancer survivors.《癌症量表的影响》第一版:在癌症幸存者的异质样本中对挪威语翻译进行心理计量学测试。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1459-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0053-y. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
2
The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) in Italian long-term cancer survivors: adaptation and psychometric evaluation.癌症量表(IOC)对意大利长期癌症幸存者的影响:适应和心理计量学评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3355-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1909-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Cancer (IOC-CS) scale for young adult survivors of childhood cancer.癌症对青年幸存者影响量表(IOC-CS)的心理计量学评估。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Mar;19(2):207-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9576-x.
4
Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale.癌症影响量表的优化与心理测量学评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Nov 5;100(21):1530-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn340. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
5
Validation of the French translation-adaptation of the impact of cancer questionnaire version 2 (IOCv2) in a breast cancer survivor population.癌症问卷第2版(IOCv2)法语翻译改编版在乳腺癌幸存者群体中的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 29;13:110. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0301-x.
6
Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.英国和美国长期非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者癌症影响的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):739-748. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale.乳腺癌幸存者自我效能感量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):E403-10. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E403-E410.
8
The Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised: translation and psychometric evaluation in Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors.《派珀疲劳量表修订版》:西班牙语乳腺癌幸存者中的翻译和心理测量评估。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0434-5. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) questionnaire: application in a sample of short-term survivors.成人癌症幸存者生活质量问卷(QLACS)西班牙语版本的跨文化适应性、信度和效度:在短期幸存者样本中的应用
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Nov 16;13:182. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0378-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring quality of life in people living with and beyond cancer in the UK.测量英国癌症患者及其康复者的生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Oct;29(10):6031-6038. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06105-z. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer.针对睾丸癌和前列腺癌长期幸存者使用的健康相关生活质量问卷的心理测量学的国际评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 11;15(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0670-4.
3
Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the impact of cancer: a comparison of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer survivors.测量癌症的影响:非霍奇金淋巴瘤和乳腺癌幸存者的比较。
J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Mar;4(1):45-58. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0106-1. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
2
Survivorship: adult cancer survivors.生存:成年癌症幸存者。
Prim Care. 2009 Dec;36(4):721-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.08.001.
3
Thyroid function in women after multimodal treatment for breast cancer stage II/III: comparison with controls from a population sample.II/III期乳腺癌多模式治疗后女性的甲状腺功能:与人群样本中的对照组比较
英国和美国长期非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者癌症影响的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):739-748. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
The impact of cancer and quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancer in Austria.奥地利乳腺癌长期幸存者中癌症的影响及生活质量
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4705-12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3319-7. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) in Italian long-term cancer survivors: adaptation and psychometric evaluation.癌症量表(IOC)对意大利长期癌症幸存者的影响:适应和心理计量学评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3355-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1909-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
Assessing quality of life in long-term cancer survivors: a review of available tools.评估长期癌症幸存者的生活质量:现有工具的综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Nov;21(11):3143-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1912-6. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 1;75(3):764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.037. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
4
Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale.癌症影响量表的优化与心理测量学评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Nov 5;100(21):1530-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn340. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
5
Measuring quality of life in cancer survivors: a methodological review of existing scales.癌症幸存者生活质量的测量:现有量表的方法学综述
Psychooncology. 2008 Jul;17(7):629-40. doi: 10.1002/pon.1281.
6
Controlled study of fatigue, quality of life, and somatic and mental morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer survivors: how lucky are the lucky ones?上皮性卵巢癌幸存者疲劳、生活质量及身心发病率的对照研究:幸运者有多幸运?
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2049-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1769.
7
The associations between living conditions, demography, and the 'impact of cancer' scale in tumor-free cancer survivors: a NOCWO study.无瘤癌症幸存者的生活条件、人口统计学与“癌症影响”量表之间的关联:一项NOCWO研究
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Nov;15(11):1309-1318. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0251-x. Epub 2007 Apr 21.
8
Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors.评估癌症的影响:为长期幸存者开发一种新工具。
Psychooncology. 2006 May;15(5):407-21. doi: 10.1002/pon.963.
9
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.医院焦虑抑郁量表的效度:一项更新的文献综述
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
10
A body image scale for use with cancer patients.一种供癌症患者使用的身体意象量表。
Eur J Cancer. 2001 Jan;37(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00353-1.