• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[提高对健康风险的理解与沟通]

[Improving comprehension and communication of risks about health].

作者信息

García-Retamero Rocío, Galesic Mirta, Gigerenzer Gerd

机构信息

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2011 Nov;23(4):599-605.

PMID:22047845
Abstract

Many patients have severe difficulties grasping several numerical concepts that are related to their health, such as, for instance, the risk of suffering various diseases. Visual aids have been proposed as a promising method for enhancing risk communication and comprehension. In medical practice, however, not all patients benefit from visual aids. In a study conducted on a probabilistic, representative national sample in the United States, we identified a group of patients for whom visual aids are most useful: Those who have low numeracy but high graphical literacy skills. These patients have high scores in three abilities involved in graph comprehension: (1) the ability to read the data, (2) the ability to read the relations between the data, and (3) the ability to read beyond the data. Our results can have important implications for medical practice and for risk communication about health.

摘要

许多患者在理解与自身健康相关的几个数字概念时存在严重困难,例如患各种疾病的风险。视觉辅助工具已被提议作为一种增强风险沟通与理解的有效方法。然而,在医疗实践中,并非所有患者都能从视觉辅助工具中受益。在美国进行的一项基于概率抽样的全国代表性样本研究中,我们确定了一组视觉辅助工具最有用的患者:那些算术能力低但图形理解能力高的患者。这些患者在涉及图形理解的三种能力方面得分较高:(1)读取数据的能力,(2)读取数据之间关系的能力,以及(3)超越数据进行解读的能力。我们的研究结果对医疗实践以及健康风险沟通具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
[Improving comprehension and communication of risks about health].[提高对健康风险的理解与沟通]
Psicothema. 2011 Nov;23(4):599-605.
2
Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].谁从视觉辅助中受益:克服人们对风险理解的挑战 [已更正]。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.031. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
3
Functional health literacy of patients with rheumatoid arthritis attending a community-based rheumatology practice.参加社区风湿病诊疗的类风湿关节炎患者的功能健康素养
J Rheumatol. 2006 May;33(5):879-86. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
4
Improving risk literacy in surgeons.提高外科医生的风险认知能力。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1156-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.主观算术能力量表的验证:低算术能力对风险沟通理解和效用引出的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07303824. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
6
Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks.使用合理的群组规模来传达有关医疗风险的信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.027. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
7
Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.根据计算能力的不同,风险沟通形式对风险感知的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):483-90. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09333122. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
8
Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools.图表素养在以患者为中心的沟通工具开发中的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis--a phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses.关于多发性硬化症治疗的循证患者信息——一项关于理解与情绪反应的一期研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.002. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
10
Strategies for improving low health literacy.提高低健康素养的策略。
Postgrad Med. 2009 Sep;121(5):171-7. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.09.2065.

引用本文的文献

1
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.《让数字有意义:健康领域概率沟通的循证综述》的范围、方法及概述性研究结果:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
How Difference Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 1: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.不同任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第1部分:使数字有意义的系统评价
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241294077. doi: 10.1177/23814683241294077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
Do you want to promote recall, perceptions, or behavior? The best data visualization depends on the communication goal.
你是想促进回忆、认知还是行为?最佳的数据可视化取决于沟通目标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):525-530. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad137.
4
The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.家庭护理护士的计算能力和图表读写能力对理解视觉显示信息的影响:对仪表板设计的启示。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):175-182. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx042.
5
Using visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: a review.使用视觉辅助工具改善健康风险沟通:一项综述
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:562637. doi: 10.1100/2012/562637. Epub 2012 May 2.