Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Uludag University Medical School, Görükle/Bursa, Turkey.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Feb;26(1):90-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVBs) have been shown to be effective for analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with single- and multiple-injection techniques. The efficacy of single-injection PVB was compared with multiple-injection PVB on postoperative analgesia in VATS was studied.
Prospective, randomized study.
Single university hospital.
Fifty patients undergoing VATS.
A nerve stimulator-guided PVB was performed in the sitting position before surgery using a solution of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine by a single injection at T6 (group S, n = 25) or by 5 injections of 4 mL each at T4 to T8 (group M, n = 25).
A successful PVB was achieved in all patients. The times to perform the blocks were 6.8 ± 1.9 minutes in the S group and 17.9 ± 3.0 minutes in the M group (p < 0.001). The times to block onset were 8.3 ± 1.8 minutes in the S group and 7.2 ± 0.9 minutes in the M group (p = 0.014). The numbers of anesthetized dermatomes were 5.8 ± 0.8 for the S group and 6.6 ± 1.1 for the M group (p = 0.009). The postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption with patient-controlled analgesia were comparable in the two groups. There were no significant differences in times to the first mobilization and hospital discharge for two groups. Patient satisfaction with the analgesic procedure was greater in the S group (p < 0.05). No complications were attributed to the blocks.
The two techniques provided comparable postoperative analgesia. However, single-injection PVB may represent an advantage over multiple-injection PVB in patients undergoing VATS, with greater patient satisfaction associated with a shorter procedure and the likelihood of decreased complications.
胸椎旁阻滞(PVB)已被证明对胸腔镜手术(VATS)后具有单针和多针注射技术的镇痛有效。本研究比较了 VATS 中单次注射 PVB 与多次注射 PVB 的术后镇痛效果。
前瞻性、随机研究。
单一大学医院。
50 例行 VATS 的患者。
手术前在坐位使用 20ml0.5%布比卡因加 1:200000 肾上腺素溶液,在 T6 处进行神经刺激器引导的 PVB,单次注射(S 组,n=25)或在 T4 至 T8 处进行 5 次 4ml 注射(M 组,n=25)。
所有患者均成功进行了 PVB。S 组的阻滞时间为 6.8±1.9 分钟,M 组的阻滞时间为 17.9±3.0 分钟(p<0.001)。S 组的阻滞起效时间为 8.3±1.8 分钟,M 组的阻滞起效时间为 7.2±0.9 分钟(p=0.014)。S 组麻醉的皮节数为 5.8±0.8,M 组为 6.6±1.1(p=0.009)。两组患者术后疼痛评分和患者自控镇痛的吗啡消耗量相似。两组患者首次活动和出院时间无显著差异。S 组患者对镇痛过程的满意度更高(p<0.05)。两种阻滞技术均未发生与阻滞相关的并发症。
两种技术均提供了相似的术后镇痛效果。然而,在接受 VATS 的患者中,单次注射 PVB 可能优于多次注射 PVB,单次注射 PVB 具有患者满意度更高、操作时间更短和并发症发生率降低的优势。