Baytar Merve Sena, Yılmaz Canan, Karasu Derya, Baytar Çağdaş
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Zonguldak Atatürk State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yüksek Ihtisas Training and Education Hospital, Health Sciences University, Bursa, Turkey.
Korean J Pain. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):234-240. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.2.234.
Various truncal block techniques with ultrasonography (USG) are becoming widespread to reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The primary aim of our study was to determine whether the USG-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is as effective as the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in VATS. Our secondary aim was to evaluate patient and surgeon satisfaction, block application time, first analgesic time, and length of hospital stay.
Patients in Group SAPB received 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine with a USG-guided SAPB, and patients in Group TPVB received 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine with a USG-guided TPVB. We recorded the pain scores, the timing of the first analgesic requirement, the amount of tramadol consumption, and postoperative complications for 24 hours. We also recorded the block application time and length of hospital stay.
A total of 62 patients, with 31 in each group (Group SAPB and Group TPVB) completed the study. Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in rest and dynamic pain visual analog scale scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The total consumption of tramadol was significantly lower in the TPVB group ( = 0.026). The block application time was significantly shorter in Group SAPB ( < 0.001).
An SAPB that is applied safely and rapidly as a part of multimodal analgesia in patients who undergo VATS is not inferior to the TPVB and can be an alternative to it.
各种超声引导下的躯干阻滞技术在电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)中广泛应用,以减轻术后疼痛并减少阿片类药物的使用。本研究的主要目的是确定超声引导下的前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)在VATS中是否与胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)同样有效。次要目的是评估患者和外科医生的满意度、阻滞操作时间、首次使用镇痛药时间以及住院时间。
SAPB组患者接受超声引导下的SAPB,注射0.4 mL/kg布比卡因,TPVB组患者接受超声引导下的TPVB,注射0.4 mL/kg布比卡因。我们记录了24小时内的疼痛评分、首次需要使用镇痛药的时间、曲马多的用量以及术后并发症。我们还记录了阻滞操作时间和住院时间。
共有62例患者完成研究,每组31例(SAPB组和TPVB组)。两组之间,术后0、1、6、12和24小时的静息和动态疼痛视觉模拟量表评分无显著差异。TPVB组曲马多的总用量显著更低(P = 0.026)。SAPB组的阻滞操作时间显著更短(P < 0.001)。
在接受VATS的患者中,作为多模式镇痛一部分安全快速实施的SAPB并不逊色于TPVB,可作为其替代方法。