Szabo S, Goldberg I
Dept. of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1990;174:1-8. doi: 10.3109/00365529009091924.
The goals of this article are to review the similarities and differences in the pathogenesis of acute gastric mucosal injury induced by alcohol, exemplified mostly by ethanol, and aspirin, as a representative of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and to deduce implications from pathogenetic studies for a better understanding of the concept of gastric cytoprotection. The main similarity between the hemorrhagic erosions caused by ethanol and aspirin is their localization in the acid-producing glandular stomach, the rate-limiting step in their pathogenesis being the extent of microvascular injury in the gastric mucosa. The major differences include the fast healing and low probability of transition into chronic gastritis after a single exposure to aspirin. On the other hand, perforated ulcer may develop, especially in the elderly, after chronic aspirin but not ethanol consumption. The main implications of pathogenetic investigations include the relative nature of gastroprotection: that is, initially, the superficial epithelial layer is not protected against concentrated luminal solutions, but it is rapidly replaced by migrating, adjacent, surviving cells if blood flow is maintained and the basement membrane is relatively intact. Vascular changes thus seem to be the rate-limiting step both in the pathogenesis and prevention of chemically induced acute gastric mucosal injury. The ultimate biochemical mechanisms of gastroprotection seem to include an effect on structural and enzymic proteins, and vascular mediators which influence vascular permeability and, indirectly, the extent of tissue injury.
本文的目的是综述酒精(主要以乙醇为例)和阿司匹林(作为非甾体抗炎药的代表)所致急性胃黏膜损伤发病机制的异同,并从发病机制研究中推断相关意义,以更好地理解胃细胞保护的概念。乙醇和阿司匹林所致出血性糜烂的主要相似之处在于它们均定位于产酸的腺胃,其发病机制中的限速步骤是胃黏膜微血管损伤的程度。主要差异包括单次服用阿司匹林后愈合快且转变为慢性胃炎的可能性低。另一方面,长期服用阿司匹林后可能发生穿孔性溃疡,尤其是在老年人中,而乙醇摄入则不会。发病机制研究的主要意义包括胃保护的相对性:即最初,浅表上皮层对浓缩的管腔溶液无保护作用,但如果血流得以维持且基底膜相对完整,迁移而来的相邻存活细胞会迅速替代它。因此,血管变化似乎是化学性诱导急性胃黏膜损伤发病机制和预防中的限速步骤。胃保护的最终生化机制似乎包括对结构蛋白和酶蛋白以及血管介质的作用,这些介质影响血管通透性,并间接影响组织损伤的程度。