Suppr超能文献

“技术”与“讨论”:在护理硕士实践课程中两种不同讲座风格的对比研究。

'Tech' versus 'talk': a comparison study of two different lecture styles within a Master of Science nurse practitioner course.

机构信息

Bouve College of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):e14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.018. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generation Y students have a strong preference for technology that has caused educators to re-evaluate their instructional techniques. Limited published literature exists evaluating the benefits of electronic lecture delivery to students enrolled within nursing degree programs, with no publications to date comparing traditional to blended learning modalities.

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively compare student outcomes, including overall course grade and individual examination scores, between two cohorts of students utilizing two distinctly different methods of lecture delivery, traditional and blended.

METHODS

IRB approval was granted to retrospectively compare student outcomes from fifty-two students enrolled within Northeastern University's Master of Science Nurse Practitioner degree program. A total of 23 students were enrolled in the traditional section taught in 2010 and 29 students were enrolled in the blended section taught in 2011. Student'st-test was used to compare studied outcomes between each section. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The students enrolled within blended course scored statistically significantly higher than their counterparts within the traditional course for three of the four studied outcomes, including overall course score.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that nursing students enrolled within a more technologically advanced course may have improved performance over students enrolled in courses with traditional lecture styles given their generational preferences for learning.

摘要

背景

Y 世代学生对技术有着强烈的偏好,这促使教育工作者重新评估他们的教学方法。目前,关于电子讲座对护理学位课程学生的益处的评估文献有限,而且迄今为止,没有将传统学习模式与混合学习模式进行比较的出版物。

目的

回顾性比较使用两种截然不同的讲座方式(传统方式和混合方式)的两个学生群体的学生成绩,包括总体课程成绩和个别考试成绩。

方法

东北大学护理硕士学位课程的 52 名学生的研究结果进行了回顾性比较,获得了 IRB 的批准。共有 23 名学生参加了 2010 年教授的传统课程,29 名学生参加了 2011 年教授的混合课程。使用学生 t 检验比较每个课程的研究结果。p 值≤0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在四项研究结果中的三项中,包括总体课程成绩,参加混合课程的学生的成绩明显高于参加传统课程的学生。

结论

这项研究表明,与参加传统讲座方式课程的学生相比,在技术更先进的课程中注册的护理学生可能会因为他们对学习的代际偏好而表现更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验