• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度失语症:一种罕见重复障碍形式的分析

Deep dysphasia: analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder.

作者信息

Katz R B, Goodglass H

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Boston University, School of Medicine, MA.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1990 Jul;39(1):153-85. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90009-6.

DOI:10.1016/0093-934x(90)90009-6
PMID:2207619
Abstract

"Deep dysphasia" is the parallel in repetition to the reading impairment deep dyslexia. Our patient, S.M., showed part of speech, word/nonword, and concreteness effects in repetition, and he made semantic errors, but his oral reading was relatively spared. Further testing indicated that S.M. did not have difficulty perceiving spoken stimuli or deciding their lexical status, but he was deficient at semantically processing spoken words. Moreover, his phonemic memory was severely impaired. We argue that the routes for repetition (lexical and nonlexical) that function without semantic mediation were defective and that deficits in phonemic memory further diminished their effectiveness, since initial phonological encoding of spoken words was not available to guide the output stages of phonological processing. In addition, the semantically mediated route for repetition was unreliable because semantic processing was faulty and S.M. could not accurately label concepts.

摘要

“深度言语困难”是与阅读障碍“深度失读症”相对应的重复方面的表现。我们的患者S.M.在重复中表现出部分词性、单词/非单词以及具体性效应,并且会犯语义错误,但他的口头阅读相对未受影响。进一步测试表明,S.M.在感知口语刺激或判断其词汇状态方面没有困难,但他在对口语单词进行语义处理时存在缺陷。此外,他的音素记忆严重受损。我们认为,在没有语义中介的情况下起作用的重复路径(词汇性和非词汇性)存在缺陷,并且音素记忆的缺陷进一步削弱了它们的有效性,因为口语单词的初始语音编码无法用于指导语音处理的输出阶段。此外,语义中介的重复路径不可靠,因为语义处理存在故障,并且S.M.无法准确标记概念。

相似文献

1
Deep dysphasia: analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder.深度失语症:一种罕见重复障碍形式的分析
Brain Lang. 1990 Jul;39(1):153-85. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90009-6.
2
Activation of the phonological lexicon for reading and object naming in deep dyslexia.深层阅读障碍中阅读和物体命名时语音词汇的激活。
Brain Lang. 1997 Jun 1;58(1):46-60. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1766.
3
Transcortical sensory aphasia: evidence for subtypes.经皮质感觉性失语症:亚型的证据。
Brain Lang. 1987 Nov;32(2):362-78. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90133-7.
4
Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit.用于输出的词汇表征获取机制:来自特定类别语义缺陷的证据。
Brain Lang. 1991 Jan;40(1):106-44. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90119-l.
5
Semantic memory and reading abilities: a case report.语义记忆与阅读能力:一例报告
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995 Jan;1(1):104-10. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700000163.
6
Impairment in processing meaningless verbal material in several modalities: the relationship between short-term memory and phonological skills.在多种模式下处理无意义言语材料的障碍:短期记忆与语音技能之间的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1989 May;41(2):293-319. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402367.
7
Reading lexically without semantics: evidence from patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.脱离语义的词汇阅读:来自疑似阿尔茨海默病患者的证据。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 Jul;2(4):340-9. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700001363.
8
The simultaneous activation hypothesis: explaining recovery from deep to phonological dyslexia.同步激活假说:解释从深层诵读困难到语音诵读困难的恢复过程。
Brain Lang. 2001 Jan;76(1):18-34. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2384.
9
Evidence for linguistic deficit in nonlexical processing in reading. A study of a Spanish-speaking patient.阅读中非词汇加工语言缺陷的证据。对一名说西班牙语患者的研究。
Span J Psychol. 2008 May;11(1):48-54. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600004108.
10
Repetition and verbal STM in transcortical sensory aphasia: a case study.经皮质感觉性失语中的重复与言语短时记忆:一项病例研究。
Brain Lang. 1990 Aug;39(2):254-88. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90014-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts.语言有重量:语言作为内在基础和抽象概念灵活性的来源。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2451-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6.
2
A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli.用具体和抽象刺激物检验符号交互依存假说。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0192719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192719. eCollection 2018.
3
Defining a Conceptual Topography of Word Concreteness: Clustering Properties of Emotion, Sensation, and Magnitude among 750 English Words.
定义词汇具体性的概念地形图:750个英语单词中情感、感觉和量级的聚类属性
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 11;8:1787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01787. eCollection 2017.
4
Effects of semantic context on access to words of low imageability in deep-phonological dysphasia: a treatment case study.语义语境对深层语音性失语症中低形象性词汇提取的影响:一项治疗案例研究。
Aphasiology. 2017;31(5):542-562. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1208803. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
5
The Differential Contributions of Conceptual Representation Format and Language Structure to Levels of Semantic Abstraction Capacity.概念表示格式和语言结构对语义抽象能力水平的差异贡献。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Jun;27(2):134-145. doi: 10.1007/s11065-016-9339-8. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.抽象概念特征评分可预测书面单词数组中的注视:来自视觉单词范式的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):659-685. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12348. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
Neural dichotomy of word concreteness: a view from functional neuroimaging.词具体性的神经二分法:来自功能神经成像的视角
Cogn Process. 2016 Feb;17(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Converging evidence from fMRI and aphasia that the left temporoparietal cortex has an essential role in representing abstract semantic knowledge.来自功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和失语症研究的越来越多的证据表明,左颞顶叶皮层在表征抽象语义知识方面起着至关重要的作用。
Cortex. 2015 Aug;69:104-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition.三个符号去根基问题:抽象概念与具身认知的未来
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1109-21. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0825-4.
10
The meaning of 'life' and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology.“生命”及其他抽象词汇的含义:来自神经心理学的见解。
J Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;10(2):317-43. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12065. Epub 2015 Feb 23.