Suppr超能文献

学生和新获得资格的助产士的临床决策探索。

An exploration of clinical decision-making among students and newly qualified midwives.

机构信息

School of Nursing Sciences, Edith Cavell Building, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2012 Dec;28(6):824-30. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to explore how midwifery students and newly qualified midwives learnt to make clinical decisions.

DESIGN

an ethnographic approach was taken. Data collection methods included: 3 focus groups, 15 observations of practice and 27 interviews. The data analysis followed the principles of category and theme identification as described by Garner (1991) and Ely et al. (1997). Vignettes were created to represent the findings.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

the study took place in the School of Nursing Sciences and 2 NHS Trusts in the Eastern region of England. Participants included 36 midwifery students, 5 midwives who had been qualified for less than 1 year and 12 midwifery mentors.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

decision-making was learnt primarily by working alongside midwifery mentors and through situated learning in practice. Decision-making was not necessarily a solo activity, it was common for midwives to use each other as a resource, which established there was a social dimension to midwifery decision-making. Learners had to navigate through workplace culture, which consisted of: the practices shared by some midwives and not others, covert rules of practice, midwifery and institutional authoritarianism.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

learners need to work with mentors who actively encourage participation in decision-making and provide discussion and feedback on decision-making abilities. When a staged and active approach to decision-making is not provided this may have negative implications on the transition to qualified practitioner.

摘要

目的

探讨助产学学生和新获得资格的助产妇如何学习做出临床决策。

设计

采用民族志方法。数据收集方法包括:3 个焦点小组、15 次实践观察和 27 次访谈。数据分析遵循 Garner(1991)和 Ely 等人(1997)描述的类别和主题识别原则。创建了案例代表研究结果。

地点和参与者

该研究在护理科学学院和英格兰东部的 2 个 NHS 信托基金进行。参与者包括 36 名助产学学生、5 名刚获得资格不到 1 年的助产士和 12 名助产士导师。

主要结论

决策主要通过与助产士导师一起工作和在实践中的情境学习来学习。决策不一定是一项单独的活动,助产士经常相互利用作为资源,这表明助产决策具有社会维度。学习者必须在工作场所文化中进行导航,其中包括:一些助产士而非其他助产士所共享的实践、隐蔽的实践规则、助产和机构威权主义。

对实践的影响

学习者需要与积极鼓励参与决策并提供决策能力讨论和反馈的导师一起工作。如果没有提供分阶段和积极的决策方法,这可能会对过渡到合格从业者产生负面影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验