Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, MS 42051, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051, USA.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011 Dec;14(4):329-76. doi: 10.1007/s10567-011-0101-8.
Models of social anxiety and depression in youth have been developed separately, and they contain similar etiological influences. Given the high comorbidity of social anxiety and depression, we examine whether the posited etiological constructs are a correlate of, or a risk factor for, social anxiety and/or depression at the symptom level and the diagnostic level. We find core risk factors of temperament, genetics, and parent psychopathology (i.e., depression and anxiety) are neither necessary nor sufficient for the development of social anxiety and/or depression. Instead, aspects of children's relationships with parents and/or peers either mediates (i.e., explains) or moderates (i.e., interacts with) these core risks being related to social anxiety and/or depression. We then examine various parent- and peer-related constructs contained in the separate models of social anxiety and depression (i.e., parent-child attachment, parenting, social skill deficits, peer acceptance and rejection, peer victimization, friendships, and loneliness). Throughout our review, we report evidence for a Cumulative Interpersonal Risk model that incorporates both core risk factors and specific interpersonal risk factors. Most studies fail to consider comorbidity, thus little is known about the specificity of these various constructs to depression and/or social anxiety. However, we identify shared, differential, and cumulative risks, correlates, consequences, and protective factors. We then put forth demonstrated pathways for the development of depression, social anxiety, and their comorbidity. Implications for understanding comorbidity are highlighted throughout, as are theoretical and research directions for developing and refining models of social anxiety, depression, and their comorbidity. Prevention and treatment implications are also noted.
青少年社交焦虑和抑郁模型是分别开发的,它们包含相似的病因学影响。鉴于社交焦虑和抑郁的高共病性,我们研究了假定的病因学结构是否是社交焦虑和/或抑郁在症状和诊断水平上的相关因素或风险因素。我们发现,气质、遗传和父母心理病理学(即抑郁和焦虑)等核心风险因素对于社交焦虑和/或抑郁的发展既不是必要的也不是充分的。相反,儿童与父母和/或同伴的关系的各个方面要么是这些核心风险与社交焦虑和/或抑郁相关的中介(即解释),要么是调节(即与这些核心风险相互作用)。然后,我们检查了社交焦虑和抑郁的单独模型中包含的各种与父母和同伴相关的结构(即亲子依恋、教养方式、社交技能缺陷、同伴接受和拒绝、同伴受害、友谊和孤独)。在整个审查过程中,我们报告了一个包含核心风险因素和特定人际风险因素的累积人际风险模型的证据。大多数研究都没有考虑到共病性,因此,对于这些各种结构对抑郁和/或社交焦虑的特异性知之甚少。然而,我们确定了共享、差异和累积风险、相关性、后果和保护因素。然后,我们提出了抑郁、社交焦虑及其共病的发展途径。在整个过程中强调了理解共病性的意义,以及发展和完善社交焦虑、抑郁及其共病模型的理论和研究方向。还注意到了预防和治疗的意义。