Department of Clinical Operations, X-pert Med GmbH, Graefelfing, Germany.
J Pain Res. 2011;4:357-63. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S24821. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Pain related to ultraviolet B radiation (UVR) induced sunburn is an established, simple, acute pain model. One of the major criticisms is related to the potential dermal adverse events caused by the UVR exposure. This study tried to validate the model for oral and topical drugs and to define the minimum required UVR exposure.
This subject- and observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluated 600 mg oral ibuprofen (IB) and topical hydrocortisone-21-acetate (HC) twice daily (bid) in 24 healthy volunteers. Treatment started immediately after irradiation and again at 12 hours, 24 hours, and 36 hours post-UVR. Assessment of hyperalgesia to heat and signs of inflammation (erythema, skin temperature) for all areas was performed after UVR and again at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. Subjects returned within 4-11 days to the study site for the second period of the study. As in the first period, subjects received HC at one side and topical placebo on the other side, but oral treatment was crossed-over.
The primary analysis failed to show the expected superiority of the IB-group vs the placebo group in period 1 of the study. Evaluating period 2 alone clearly showed the expected treatment effects of IB for erythema and heat pain threshold. The results were less pronounced for skin temperature. In contrast to IB vs oral placebo, there were no differences in treatment response between HC and topical placebo. UVR at all dosages induced profound erythema and reduction of heat pain threshold without causing blisters or other unexpected discomfort to the subjects. The changes were almost linear between 1 and 2 minimal erythema doses (MED), whereas the change from 2 to 3 MED was less pronounced.
Use of 2 MED in upcoming studies seems to be reasonable to limit subjects' UVB exposure. The following procedural changes are suggested: Intensified training sessions before randomization to treatmentIncrease in sample size if they are crossover studiesSimplification in design (either oral or topical treatment).
与紫外线 B 辐射(UVR)诱导的晒伤相关的疼痛是一种已确立的简单急性疼痛模型。主要批评之一与 UVR 暴露引起的潜在皮肤不良事件有关。本研究试图验证该模型在口服和局部药物中的应用,并确定最小的 UVR 暴露量。
本研究为受试者和观察者双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究,评估了 24 名健康志愿者每天两次口服布洛芬(IB)600mg 和外用氢化可的松-21-醋酸酯(HC)。治疗在照射后立即开始,并在 UVR 后 12 小时、24 小时和 36 小时再次进行。在 UVR 后和 6、12、24、36 和 48 小时评估所有区域的热痛觉过敏和炎症迹象(红斑、皮肤温度)。受试者在 4-11 天内返回研究现场进行研究的第二阶段。与第一阶段一样,受试者一侧接受 HC,另一侧接受局部安慰剂,但口服治疗交叉。
主要分析未能显示 IB 组与安慰剂组在研究第一阶段的预期优势。单独评估第二阶段清楚地显示了 IB 对红斑和热痛觉阈值的预期治疗效果。皮肤温度的结果则不那么明显。与 IB 与口服安慰剂相比,HC 与局部安慰剂之间的治疗反应没有差异。所有剂量的 UVR 均能引起明显的红斑和热痛觉阈值降低,而不会导致水疱或其他不适。在 1 和 2 个最小红斑剂量(MED)之间,变化几乎呈线性,而从 2 到 3 MED 的变化则不那么明显。
在即将进行的研究中,使用 2 MED 似乎可以合理地限制受试者的 UVB 暴露。建议进行以下程序更改:在随机分组前加强培训课程如果是交叉研究,增加样本量简化设计(口服或局部治疗)。