• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次剖宫产术后再次分娩发生前置胎盘的风险:一项基于人群的研究和荟萃分析。

Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Nov 21;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-95.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-11-95
PMID:22103697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3247856/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of placenta previa at second birth among women who had a cesarean section (CS) at first birth with women who delivered vaginally.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 399,674 women who gave birth to a singleton first and second baby between April 2000 and February 2009 in England. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust the estimates for maternal age, ethnicity, deprivation, placenta previa at first birth, inter-birth interval and pregnancy complications. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of the reported results in peer-reviewed articles since 1980.

RESULTS

The rate of placenta previa at second birth for women with vaginal first births was 4.4 per 1000 births, compared to 8.7 per 1000 births for women with CS at first birth. After adjustment, CS at first birth remained associated with an increased risk of placenta previa (odds ratio = 1.60; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.76). In the meta-analysis of 37 previously published studies from 21 countries, the overall pooled random effects odds ratio was 2.20 (95% CI 1.96-2.46). Our results from the current study is consistent with those of the meta-analysis as the pooled odds ratio for the six population-based cohort studies that analyzed second births only was 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.65).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of placenta previa in the subsequent pregnancy after CS delivery at first birth, but the risk is lower than previously estimated. Given the placenta previa rate in England and the adjusted effect of previous CS, 359 deliveries by CS at first birth would result in one additional case of placenta previa in the next pregnancy.

摘要

目的

比较首次剖宫产(CS)分娩与阴道分娩的女性在第二次分娩时前置胎盘的风险。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2000 年 4 月至 2009 年 2 月期间在英格兰首次分娩单胎的 399674 名女性。采用多因素逻辑回归校正了母亲年龄、种族、贫困程度、首次分娩时前置胎盘、分娩间隔和妊娠并发症等因素的影响。此外,我们还对 1980 年以来已发表的同行评议文章中报告的结果进行了荟萃分析。

结果

阴道分娩的女性第二次分娩时前置胎盘的发生率为每 1000 例 4.4 例,而 CS 分娩的女性为每 1000 例 8.7 例。校正后,首次 CS 分娩与前置胎盘的风险增加相关(比值比=1.60;95%可信区间 1.44-1.76)。在来自 21 个国家的 37 项已发表研究的荟萃分析中,总体随机效应比值比为 2.20(95%可信区间 1.96-2.46)。我们当前研究的结果与荟萃分析一致,因为仅分析第二次分娩的 6 项基于人群的队列研究的汇总比值比为 1.51(95%可信区间 1.39-1.65)。

结论

首次 CS 分娩后再次妊娠发生前置胎盘的风险增加,但风险低于之前的估计。考虑到英国的前置胎盘发生率和之前 CS 的调整效果,首次 CS 分娩会导致下一次妊娠中增加 359 例前置胎盘。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/3247856/4d50241b2d35/1471-2393-11-95-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/3247856/4d50241b2d35/1471-2393-11-95-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db05/3247856/4d50241b2d35/1471-2393-11-95-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis.首次剖宫产术后再次分娩发生前置胎盘的风险:一项基于人群的研究和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Nov 21;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-95.
2
First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth(1).首次分娩剖宫产与第二次分娩时胎盘早剥或前置胎盘(1)。
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 1):765-9.
3
The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis.前置胎盘与剖宫产史及流产史的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;177(5):1071-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70017-6.
4
Placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery: how strong is the association?前置胎盘与既往剖宫产:关联有多强?
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;84(1):55-7.
5
Previous cesarean birth. A risk factor for placenta previa?既往剖宫产。前置胎盘的一个危险因素?
J Reprod Med. 1997 Jul;42(7):409-12.
6
Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption.既往剖宫产与前置胎盘及胎盘早剥的风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):771-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80.
7
Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy.初产剖宫产与再次妊娠前置胎盘及胎盘早剥的相关性
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01295.x. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
8
Effect of the delivery way and number of parity in the subsequent incidence of placenta previa.分娩方式和经产次数对前置胎盘发病的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(19):3238-3243. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1570121. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity.剖宫产次数越多、产次越高,前置胎盘的可能性越大。
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):976-80. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02002-1.
10
Previous prelabor or intrapartum cesarean delivery and risk of placenta previa.既往临产前或产时剖宫产与前置胎盘风险
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):669.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors for placenta previa in a specialty hospital.专科医院前置胎盘的患病率及危险因素
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 15;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo30. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors and outcomes for placental anomalies: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.胎盘异常的因素和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jan 19;14:04013. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04013.
3
Enhancing postpartum hemorrhage prediction in pernicious placenta previa: a comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound nomogram.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa.胎盘前置的危险因素及结局的批判性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;284(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1598-7. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
2
Monitoring the quality of maternity care: how well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data?监测孕产妇护理质量:人口健康数据中分娩事件的报告情况如何?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;23(2):144-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00980.x.
3
Comparison of maternal risk factors between placental abruption and placenta previa.
提高凶险性前置胎盘中产后出血的预测:磁共振成像与超声列线图的比较研究
Front Physiol. 2023 Aug 8;14:1177795. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1177795. eCollection 2023.
4
Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes Following a Natural Cycle vs. Artificial Endometrial Preparation for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.自然周期与人工子宫内膜准备用于冻融胚胎移植后的生殖及产科结局:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 13;12(12):4032. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124032.
5
Association between vaginal or cesarean delivery and later development of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective population-based cohort study.阴道分娩或剖宫产与压力性尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂的后续发展之间的关联:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2041-2047. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05504-6. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Comparison of Placenta Previa and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Following Previous Cesarean Section between Women with a Short and Normal Interpregnancy Interval.既往剖宫产术后妊娠间隔短与正常的女性前置胎盘和胎盘植入谱系疾病的比较
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2022 Aug 3;2022:8028639. doi: 10.1155/2022/8028639. eCollection 2022.
7
Mode of birth in women with low-lying placenta: protocol for a prospective multicentre 1:3 matched case-control study in Italy (the MODEL-PLACENTA study).低置胎盘产妇分娩方式的前瞻性多中心 1:3 病例对照研究方案(MODEL-PLACENTA 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e052510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052510.
8
Pregnancy-Related Hysterectomy for Peripartum Hemorrhage: A Literature Narrative Review of the Diagnosis, Management, and Techniques.妊娠相关的产后出血子宫切除术:诊断、处理和技术的文献叙述性综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 6;2021:9958073. doi: 10.1155/2021/9958073. eCollection 2021.
9
Development and validation of a prediction model on severe maternal outcomes among pregnant women with pre-eclampsia: a 10-year cohort study.预测子痫前期孕妇严重母胎结局的模型的建立与验证:一项 10 年队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 24;10(1):15590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72527-0.
10
National data opt out programme: consequences for maternity statistics in England.国家数据退出计划:对英格兰孕产妇统计数据的影响
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Jan 30;5(1). doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1126.
胎盘早剥与前置胎盘产妇危险因素的比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):279-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103156. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
4
Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies.剖宫产与后续妊娠。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1327-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181744110.
5
Understanding uncertainty.理解不确定性。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):196-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.848.
6
Fertility assumptions for the 2006-based national population projections.基于2006年的全国人口预测的生育假设。
Popul Trends. 2008 Spring(131):19-27.
7
Learning from adverse clinical outcomes: major obstetric haemorrhage in Scotland, 2003-05.从不良临床结局中学习:2003 - 2005年苏格兰的严重产科出血情况
BJOG. 2007 Nov;114(11):1388-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01533.x.
8
Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.在逻辑回归分析中估计调整后的需治疗人数(NNT)指标。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5586-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.3061.
9
Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy.初产剖宫产与再次妊娠前置胎盘及胎盘早剥的相关性
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01295.x. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
10
Risk factors for placenta previa in an Asian population.亚洲人群前置胎盘的危险因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Apr;97(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Feb 21.