Weiss Peter H, Ubben Simon D, Kaesberg Stephanie, Kalbe Elke, Kessler Josef, Liebig Thomas, Fink Gereon R
Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Jan;221(1):563-76. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0925-3. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
It is debated how language and praxis are co-represented in the left hemisphere (LH). As voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping in LH stroke patients with aphasia and/or apraxia may contribute to this debate, we here investigated the relationship between language and praxis deficits at the behavioral and lesion levels in 50 sub-acute stroke patients. We hypothesized that language and (meaningful) action are linked via semantic processing in Broca's region. Behaviorally, half of the patients suffered from co-morbid aphasia and apraxia. While 24% (n = 12) of all patients exhibited aphasia without apraxia, apraxia without aphasia was rare (n = 2, 4%). Left inferior frontal, insular, inferior parietal, and superior temporal lesions were specifically associated with deficits in naming, reading, writing, or auditory comprehension. In contrast, lesions affecting the left inferior frontal gyrus, premotor cortex, and the central region as well as the inferior parietal lobe were associated with apraxic deficits (i.e., pantomime, imitation of meaningful and meaningless gestures). Thus, contrary to the predictions of the embodied cognition theory, lesions to sensorimotor and premotor areas were associated with the severity of praxis but not language deficits. Lesions of Brodmann area (BA) 44 led to combined apraxic and aphasic deficits. Data suggest that BA 44 acts as an interface between language and (meaningful) action thereby supporting parcellation schemes (based on connectivity and receptor mapping) which revealed a BA 44 sub-area involved in semantic processing.
语言和实践在左半球(LH)中如何共同呈现仍存在争议。由于对患有失语症和/或失用症的左半球中风患者进行基于体素的损伤-症状映射可能有助于这场辩论,我们在此研究了50例亚急性中风患者在行为和损伤水平上语言和失用症缺陷之间的关系。我们假设语言和(有意义的)动作通过布罗卡区的语义处理相联系。在行为层面,一半的患者患有失语症和失用症共病。虽然所有患者中有24%(n = 12)表现出失语症但无失用症,而无失语症的失用症则很罕见(n = 2,4%)。左额下回、岛叶、顶下小叶和颞上回的损伤与命名、阅读、书写或听觉理解缺陷特别相关。相比之下,影响左额下回、运动前区皮质、中央区以及顶下叶的损伤与失用症缺陷(即手势模仿、有意义和无意义手势的模仿)相关。因此,与具身认知理论的预测相反,感觉运动区和运动前区的损伤与失用症的严重程度相关,但与语言缺陷无关。布罗德曼区(BA)44的损伤导致失用症和失语症合并缺陷。数据表明,BA 44作为语言和(有意义的)动作之间的接口,从而支持了基于连接性和受体映射的分区方案,该方案揭示了一个参与语义处理的BA 44子区域。