Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei Province, Anhui 230032, People's Republic of China.
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Apr;15(4):673-82. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011003077. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
To determine the association between major dietary patterns characterized by factor analysis and risk of depression and anxiety symptoms among adolescents.
Diet and symptoms of depression and anxiety were assessed in a cross-sectional survey among students attending junior high school. Dietary patterns were derived from a self-reported FFQ, which consisted of thirty-eight items. Anthropometric measurements were also performed.
Four junior high schools in Bengbu city, China.
A random sample of 5003 adolescents, 11-16 years of age (mean 13·21 years).
Three major dietary patterns were identified in the study based on factor analysis: 'snack', 'animal food' and 'traditional'. The prevalence of depression symptoms, anxiety disorders and the coexistence of both were 11·2% (560/5003), 14·6% (732/5003) and 12·6% (629/5003), respectively. After adjustment for potential confounders, adolescents in the highest tertile of snack dietary pattern scores had a higher odds for 'pure' psychological symptoms ('depression without anxiety', OR = 1·64; 95% CI 1·30, 2·06; and 'anxiety without depression', OR = 1·87; 95% CI 1·51, 2·31) compared with coexisting depression and anxiety (OR = 1·93; 95% CI 1·54, 2·43). Similar to snacks, high consumption of animal foods was associated with a higher risk of psychological symptoms. Compared with low consumption, adolescents in the highest tertile of traditional dietary pattern scores had lower odds for 'pure' depression (OR = 0·38; 95% CI 0·30, 0·49), 'pure' anxiety (OR = 0·85; 95% CI 0·69, 1·04) and coexisting anxiety and depression (OR = 0·50; 95% CI 0·39, 0·63).
Data from Chinese secondary-school adolescents validated findings from adult populations. Dietary patterns should be considered as important predictors of depression and anxiety among adolescents in further studies.
通过因子分析确定主要饮食模式与青少年抑郁和焦虑症状风险之间的关联。
在对初中生进行的横断面调查中评估饮食和抑郁及焦虑症状。饮食模式来自一份自我报告的 FFQ,该问卷由 38 个项目组成。还进行了人体测量。
中国蚌埠市四所初中。
随机抽取的 5003 名 11-16 岁(平均年龄 13.21 岁)青少年。
基于因子分析,研究中确定了三种主要饮食模式:“零食”、“动物食品”和“传统”。抑郁症状、焦虑障碍和两者并存的患病率分别为 11.2%(560/5003)、14.6%(732/5003)和 12.6%(629/5003)。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,零食饮食模式得分最高的青少年出现“单纯”心理症状(“无焦虑的抑郁”,OR=1.64;95%CI 1.30,2.06;和“无抑郁的焦虑”,OR=1.87;95%CI 1.51,2.31)的可能性高于同时存在的抑郁和焦虑(OR=1.93;95%CI 1.54,2.43)。与零食相似,大量食用动物食品与更高的心理症状风险相关。与低摄入量相比,传统饮食模式得分最高的青少年出现“单纯”抑郁(OR=0.38;95%CI 0.30,0.49)、“单纯”焦虑(OR=0.85;95%CI 0.69,1.04)和同时存在的焦虑和抑郁(OR=0.50;95%CI 0.39,0.63)的可能性较低。
来自中国中学生的数据验证了成人人群的研究结果。在进一步的研究中,饮食模式应被视为青少年抑郁和焦虑的重要预测因素。